• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过糖尿病门诊服务检测医院欺诈和索赔滥用行为。

Detecting hospital fraud and claim abuse through diabetic outpatient services.

作者信息

Liou Fen-May, Tang Ying-Chan, Chen Jean-Yi

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Business Management, Yuanpei University Hsinchu, 306, Yuanpei St., Hsin Chu 300, Taiwan.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Dec;11(4):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s10729-008-9054-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-008-9054-y
PMID:18998594
Abstract

Hospitals and health care providers tend to get involved in exaggerated and fraudulent medical claims initiated by national insurance schemes. The present study applies data mining techniques to detect fraudulent or abusive reporting by healthcare providers using their invoices for diabetic outpatient services. This research is pursued in the context of Taiwan's National Health Insurance system. We compare the identification accuracy of three algorithms: logistic regression, neural network, and classification trees. While all three are quite accurate, the classification tree model performs the best with an overall correct identification rate of 99%. It is followed by the neural network (96%) and the logistic regression model (92%).

摘要

医院和医疗保健提供者往往会卷入由国家保险计划发起的夸大和欺诈性医疗索赔中。本研究应用数据挖掘技术,通过医疗保健提供者的糖尿病门诊服务发票来检测欺诈或滥用报告。这项研究是在台湾国民健康保险系统的背景下进行的。我们比较了三种算法的识别准确率:逻辑回归、神经网络和分类树。虽然这三种算法都相当准确,但分类树模型表现最佳,总体正确识别率为99%。其次是神经网络(96%)和逻辑回归模型(92%)。

相似文献

1
Detecting hospital fraud and claim abuse through diabetic outpatient services.通过糖尿病门诊服务检测医院欺诈和索赔滥用行为。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Dec;11(4):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s10729-008-9054-y.
2
Accuracy of diabetes diagnosis in health insurance claims data in Taiwan.台湾健康保险理赔数据中糖尿病诊断的准确性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2005 Mar;104(3):157-63.
3
Multi-stage methodology to detect health insurance claim fraud.用于检测医疗保险索赔欺诈的多阶段方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Sep;19(3):249-60. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9317-3. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
4
Using data mining to find fraud in HCFA health care claims.利用数据挖掘技术查找医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医疗保健索赔中的欺诈行为。
Top Health Inf Manage. 2001 Aug;22(1):1-13.
5
Continuity of diabetes care is associated with avoidable hospitalizations: evidence from Taiwan's National Health Insurance scheme.糖尿病管理的连续性与可避免的住院治疗有关:来自台湾全民健康保险计划的证据。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Feb;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp059. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
6
Health care utilization and expenditures of persons with diabetes comorbid with anxiety disorder: a national population-based cohort study.患有焦虑障碍的糖尿病患者的医疗保健利用和支出:一项全国基于人群的队列研究。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jul-Aug;37(4):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
7
Fraud and Abuse in the Saudi Healthcare System: A Triangulation Analysis.沙特医疗保健系统中的欺诈与滥用:三角分析。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020954624. doi: 10.1177/0046958020954624.
8
Using data mining to detect health care fraud and abuse: a review of literature.利用数据挖掘检测医疗保健欺诈与滥用行为:文献综述
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Aug 31;7(1):194-202. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n1p194.
9
Association between supplementary private health insurance and visits to physician offices versus hospital outpatient departments among adults with diabetes in the universal public insurance system.全民公共保险制度下,糖尿病患者补充私人医疗保险与就诊医师办公室和医院门诊部的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0192205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192205. eCollection 2018.
10
Incidence and prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus in Taiwan: analysis of the 2000-2009 Nationwide Health Insurance database.台湾地区糖尿病发病率和流行率分析:2000-2009 年全民健康保险数据库资料。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Nov;111(11):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A global scoping review on the patterns of medical fraud and abuse: integrating data-driven detection, prevention, and legal responses.关于医疗欺诈和滥用模式的全球范围综述:整合数据驱动的检测、预防及法律应对措施
Arch Public Health. 2025 Feb 17;83(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01512-8.
2
Analysis and prediction of older adult sports participation in South Korea using artificial neural networks and logistic regression models.利用人工神经网络和逻辑回归模型分析和预测韩国老年人的体育参与情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04375-2.
3
Fourteen years of manifestations and factors of health insurance fraud, 2006-2020: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Data mining applications in healthcare.医疗保健中的数据挖掘应用。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005 Spring;19(2):64-72.
2
Standards of medical care in diabetes.糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27 Suppl 1:S15-35. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s15.
3
Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病诊断与分类专家委员会报告
2006 - 2020年医疗保险欺诈的表现及因素十四年:一项范围综述
Health Justice. 2021 Sep 30;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00149-3.
4
Positioning the National Health Insurance for financial sustainability and Universal Health Coverage in Ghana: A qualitative study among key stakeholders.定位加纳国家健康保险以实现财务可持续性和全民健康覆盖:关键利益相关者的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0253109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253109. eCollection 2021.
5
Medical Fraud and Abuse Detection System Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的医疗欺诈和滥用检测系统。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 5;17(19):7265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197265.
6
Interventions to reduce corruption in the health sector.减少卫生部门腐败现象的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD008856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008856.pub2.
7
Improving Fraud and Abuse Detection in General Physician Claims: A Data Mining Study.提高普通内科医生索赔中的欺诈和滥用检测:一项数据挖掘研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 10;5(3):165-72. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.196.
8
Multi-stage methodology to detect health insurance claim fraud.用于检测医疗保险索赔欺诈的多阶段方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Sep;19(3):249-60. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9317-3. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
9
Using data mining to detect health care fraud and abuse: a review of literature.利用数据挖掘检测医疗保健欺诈与滥用行为:文献综述
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Aug 31;7(1):194-202. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n1p194.
10
No evidence of the effect of the interventions to combat health care fraud and abuse: a systematic review of literature.无对抗医疗保健欺诈和滥用的干预措施效果的证据:文献系统评价。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041988. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jan;26 Suppl 1:S5-20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5.
4
The epidemiology of complications.并发症的流行病学
Diabetes Care. 2002 May;25(5):924-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.5.924.
5
Data mining approach to policy analysis in a health insurance domain.健康保险领域中用于政策分析的数据挖掘方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Jul;62(2-3):103-11. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00154-x.
6
Type 2 diabetes mellitus: the grand overview.2型糖尿病:全面概述
Diabet Med. 1998;15 Suppl 4:S4-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9136(1998120)15:4+<s4::aid-dia735>3.3.co;2-t.