• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving Fraud and Abuse Detection in General Physician Claims: A Data Mining Study.提高普通内科医生索赔中的欺诈和滥用检测:一项数据挖掘研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 10;5(3):165-72. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.196.
2
Characteristics of Physicians Excluded From US Medicare and State Public Insurance Programs for Fraud, Health Crimes, or Unlawful Prescribing of Controlled Substances.因欺诈、医疗犯罪或非法开具受控物质而被美国医疗保险和州公共保险计划排除在外的医生的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185805. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5805.
3
Using data mining to detect health care fraud and abuse: a review of literature.利用数据挖掘检测医疗保健欺诈与滥用行为:文献综述
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Aug 31;7(1):194-202. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n1p194.
4
[Creating and validating a tool able to detect fraud by prescription falsification from health insurance administration databases].[创建并验证一种能够从医疗保险管理数据库中检测处方伪造欺诈行为的工具]
Therapie. 2009 Jan-Feb;64(1):27-31. doi: 10.2515/therapie/2009004. Epub 2009 May 26.
5
Multi-stage methodology to detect health insurance claim fraud.用于检测医疗保险索赔欺诈的多阶段方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Sep;19(3):249-60. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9317-3. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
A new application of community detection for identifying the real specialty of physicians.一种新的社区检测应用,用于确定医生的真实专业。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Aug;140:104161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104161. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
An analysis of one potential form of health care fraud in Canada.对加拿大医疗保健欺诈的一种潜在形式的分析。
CMAJ. 2003 Jul 22;169(2):118-9.
8
Detecting medical prescriptions suspected of fraud using an unsupervised data mining algorithm.使用无监督数据挖掘算法检测疑似欺诈的医疗处方。
Daru. 2018 Dec;26(2):209-214. doi: 10.1007/s40199-018-0227-z. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
9
Fee Splitting among General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran.全科医生之间的费用分摊:伊朗的一项横断面研究。
Arch Iran Med. 2016 Dec;19(12):861-865.
10
A prescription fraud detection model.处方欺诈检测模型。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Apr;106(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A global scoping review on the patterns of medical fraud and abuse: integrating data-driven detection, prevention, and legal responses.关于医疗欺诈和滥用模式的全球范围综述:整合数据驱动的检测、预防及法律应对措施
Arch Public Health. 2025 Feb 17;83(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01512-8.
2
A decision rule algorithm for the detection of patients with hypertension using claims data.一种利用理赔数据检测高血压患者的决策规则算法。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01519-y. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Uses of private health provider data for governance in low-income and middle-income countries: results from a scoping review.私营医疗服务提供者数据在中低收入国家治理中的使用:一项范围综述的结果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 17;14(11):e083096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083096.
4
Tribulations and future opportunities for artificial intelligence in precision medicine.人工智能在精准医学中的困境与未来机遇。
J Transl Med. 2024 Apr 30;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05067-0.
5
The Experiences of Strategic Purchasing of Healthcare in Nine Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Qualitative Review.九国中医疗保健战略采购的经验:系统定性评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7352. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7352. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
6
Understanding conflicts of interest in rational drug prescription in a developing country: A stakeholder analysis, healthcare guidelines and ethical public health issues.了解发展中国家合理药物处方中的利益冲突:利益相关者分析、医疗保健指南和伦理公共卫生问题。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2023 Nov 1;64(3):E358-E366. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.3.3036. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Why Not Blow the Whistle on Health Care Insurance Fraud? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China.为何不揭发医疗保险欺诈行为?来自中国江苏省的证据。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct 12;15:1897-1915. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S379300. eCollection 2022.
8
Detecting fraud, waste, and abuse in substance use disorder treatment.检测物质使用障碍治疗中的欺诈、浪费和滥用行为。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):997-1000. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14046. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Healthcare Fraud Data Mining Methods: A Look Back and Look Ahead.医疗保健欺诈数据挖掘方法:回顾与展望。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1i. eCollection 2022 Winter.
10
Fourteen years of manifestations and factors of health insurance fraud, 2006-2020: a scoping review.2006 - 2020年医疗保险欺诈的表现及因素十四年:一项范围综述
Health Justice. 2021 Sep 30;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00149-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Using data mining to detect health care fraud and abuse: a review of literature.利用数据挖掘检测医疗保健欺诈与滥用行为:文献综述
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Aug 31;7(1):194-202. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n1p194.
2
No evidence of the effect of the interventions to combat health care fraud and abuse: a systematic review of literature.无对抗医疗保健欺诈和滥用的干预措施效果的证据:文献系统评价。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041988. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
3
A prescription fraud detection model.处方欺诈检测模型。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Apr;106(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
4
Can rational prescribing be improved by an outcome-based educational approach? A randomized trial completed in Iran.基于结果的教育方法能否改善合理用药?在伊朗完成的一项随机试验。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Winter;30(1):11-8. doi: 10.1002/chp.20051.
5
Effect of interactive group discussion among physicians to promote rational prescribing.医生之间互动小组讨论对促进合理用药的影响。
East Mediterr Health J. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):408-15.
6
Detecting hospital fraud and claim abuse through diabetic outpatient services.通过糖尿病门诊服务检测医院欺诈和索赔滥用行为。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Dec;11(4):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s10729-008-9054-y.
7
A survey on statistical methods for health care fraud detection.医疗保健欺诈检测统计方法调查
Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Sep;11(3):275-87. doi: 10.1007/s10729-007-9045-4.
8
Dual practice in the health sector: review of the evidence.卫生部门的双重执业:证据综述。
Hum Resour Health. 2004 Oct 27;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-2-14.
9
Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues.经济激励对医疗实践的影响:文献系统评价结果及方法学问题
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Apr;12(2):133-42. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.2.133.
10
Health care fraud and abuse.医疗保健欺诈与滥用。
JAMA. 1999;282(12):1163-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.12.1163.

提高普通内科医生索赔中的欺诈和滥用检测:一项数据挖掘研究。

Improving Fraud and Abuse Detection in General Physician Claims: A Data Mining Study.

作者信息

Joudaki Hossein, Rashidian Arash, Minaei-Bidgoli Behrouz, Mahmoodi Mahmood, Geraili Bijan, Nasiri Mahdi, Arab Mohammad

机构信息

Health Economics Group, Social Security Organization, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 10;5(3):165-72. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.196.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.196
PMID:26927587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4770922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify the indicators of healthcare fraud and abuse in general physicians' drug prescription claims, and to identify a subset of general physicians that were more likely to have committed fraud and abuse.

METHODS

We applied data mining approach to a major health insurance organization dataset of private sector general physicians' prescription claims. It involved 5 steps: clarifying the nature of the problem and objectives, data preparation, indicator identification and selection, cluster analysis to identify suspect physicians, and discriminant analysis to assess the validity of the clustering approach.

RESULTS

Thirteen indicators were developed in total. Over half of the general physicians (54%) were 'suspects' of conducting abusive behavior. The results also identified 2% of physicians as suspects of fraud. Discriminant analysis suggested that the indicators demonstrated adequate performance in the detection of physicians who were suspect of perpetrating fraud (98%) and abuse (85%) in a new sample of data.

CONCLUSION

Our data mining approach will help health insurance organizations in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) in streamlining auditing approaches towards the suspect groups rather than routine auditing of all physicians.

摘要

背景

我们旨在确定全科医生药物处方索赔中的医疗欺诈和滥用指标,并找出更有可能实施欺诈和滥用行为的全科医生子集。

方法

我们将数据挖掘方法应用于一个主要健康保险组织的私营部门全科医生处方索赔数据集。它包括5个步骤:明确问题的性质和目标、数据准备、指标识别与选择、聚类分析以识别可疑医生,以及判别分析以评估聚类方法的有效性。

结果

总共制定了13个指标。超过一半的全科医生(54%)是实施滥用行为的“嫌疑人”。结果还确定2%的医生为欺诈嫌疑人。判别分析表明,这些指标在检测新数据样本中涉嫌欺诈(98%)和滥用(85%)的医生方面表现良好。

结论

我们的数据挖掘方法将有助于低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的健康保险组织简化对可疑群体的审计方法,而不是对所有医生进行常规审计。