Yuan Y, Gu Z-X, Wei W-S
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Feb;30(2):404-10. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1357. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD). To diagnose AD at an early stage, one must develop highly specific and sensitive tools to identify it among at-risk subjects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the ability of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET), single-photon emission tomography (SPECT), and structural MR imaging to predict conversion to AD in patients with MCI.
Relevant studies were identified with MEDLINE from January 1990 to April 2008. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were done on the diagnostic performance data for each technique from eligible studies. We estimated and compared the weighted summary sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios (LRs), and summary receiver operating characteristic curves of each imaging technique.
Twenty-four eligible studies were included, with a total of 1112 patients. FDG-PET performed statistically better in LR+ and odds ratio (OR), whereas no statistical difference was found in pooled sensitivity, specificity, and LR- for each technique. No statistical difference was confirmed between SPECT and MR imaging. The Q* index estimates for FDG-PET, SPECT, and structural MR imaging were respectively 0.86, 0.75, and 0.76. In meta-regression, statistical significance was found only between technique and log OR, with a regression coefficient of -0.575.
This meta-analysis showed that FDG-PET performs slightly better than SPECT and structural MR imaging in the prediction of conversion to AD in patients with MCI; parallel performance was found between SPECT and MR imaging.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者有患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险。为了早期诊断AD,必须开发出高度特异且灵敏的工具,以便在高危人群中识别该病。本研究的目的是评估和比较氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)、单光子发射断层扫描(SPECT)及结构磁共振成像预测MCI患者转化为AD的能力。
利用MEDLINE检索1990年1月至2008年4月的相关研究。对符合条件的研究中各技术的诊断性能数据进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归。我们估计并比较了每种成像技术的加权汇总敏感度、特异度、似然比(LR)及汇总受试者工作特征曲线。
纳入24项符合条件的研究,共1112例患者。FDG-PET在阳性似然比(LR+)和比值比(OR)方面表现出统计学上更好的性能,而每种技术在汇总敏感度、特异度和阴性似然比(LR-)方面未发现统计学差异。SPECT与磁共振成像之间未证实有统计学差异。FDG-PET、SPECT及结构磁共振成像的Q*指数估计值分别为0.86、0.75和0.76。在荟萃回归中,仅在技术与对数OR之间发现统计学意义,回归系数为-0.575。
这项荟萃分析表明,在预测MCI患者转化为AD方面,FDG-PET的表现略优于SPECT和结构磁共振成像;SPECT与磁共振成像表现相当。