Suppr超能文献

作为盆腔肿瘤深部热疗中基于热剂量参数(HTP)引导的治疗工具的自适应功率密度优化。

Complaint-adaptive power density optimization as a tool for HTP-guided steering in deep hyperthermia treatment of pelvic tumors.

作者信息

Canters R A M, Franckena M, van der Zee J, Van Rhoon G C

机构信息

Erasmus MC, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, hyperthermia unit, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 7;53(23):6799-820. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/010. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

Abstract

For an efficient clinical use of HTP (hyperthermia treatment planning), optimization methods are needed. In this study, a complaint-adaptive PD (power density) optimization as a tool for HTP-guided steering in deep hyperthermia of pelvic tumors is developed and tested. PD distribution in patients is predicted using FE-models. Two goal functions, Opt1 and Opt2, are applied to optimize PD distributions. Optimization consists of three steps: initial optimization, adaptive optimization after a first complaint and increasing the weight of a region after recurring complaints. Opt1 initially considers only target PD whereas Opt2 also takes into account hot spots. After patient complaints though, both limit PD in a region. Opt1 and Opt2 are evaluated in a phantom test, using patient models and during hyperthermia treatment. The phantom test and a sensitivity study in ten patient models, show that HTP-guided steering is most effective in peripheral complaint regions. Clinical evaluation in two groups of five patients shows that time between complaints is longer using Opt2 (p = 0.007). However, this does not lead to significantly different temperatures (T50s of 40.3 (Opt1) versus 40.1 degrees C (Opt2) (p = 0.898)). HTP-guided steering is feasible in terms of PD reduction in complaint regions and in time consumption. Opt2 is preferable in future use, because of better complaint reduction and control.

摘要

为了高效临床应用热疗治疗计划(HTP),需要优化方法。在本研究中,开发并测试了一种基于患者反馈的功率密度(PD)优化方法,作为盆腔肿瘤深部热疗中HTP引导式调整的工具。利用有限元模型预测患者体内的PD分布。应用两个目标函数Opt1和Opt2来优化PD分布。优化包括三个步骤:初始优化、首次反馈后的自适应优化以及反复反馈后增加某一区域的权重。Opt1最初仅考虑目标PD,而Opt2还考虑热点。然而,在患者反馈后,两者都会限制某一区域的PD。在体模测试、使用患者模型以及热疗治疗过程中对Opt1和Opt2进行了评估。体模测试和对十个患者模型的敏感性研究表明,HTP引导式调整在周边反馈区域最为有效。对两组各五名患者的临床评估表明,使用Opt2时反馈间隔时间更长(p = 0.007)。然而,这并未导致显著不同的温度(Opt1的T50为40.3℃,Opt2为40.1℃,p = 0.898)。就减少反馈区域的PD以及时间消耗而言,HTP引导式调整是可行的。由于能更好地减少和控制反馈,Opt2在未来使用中更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验