Canters R A M, Franckena M, van der Zee J, Van Rhoon G C
Erasmus MC, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, hyperthermia unit, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 7;53(23):6799-820. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/010. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
For an efficient clinical use of HTP (hyperthermia treatment planning), optimization methods are needed. In this study, a complaint-adaptive PD (power density) optimization as a tool for HTP-guided steering in deep hyperthermia of pelvic tumors is developed and tested. PD distribution in patients is predicted using FE-models. Two goal functions, Opt1 and Opt2, are applied to optimize PD distributions. Optimization consists of three steps: initial optimization, adaptive optimization after a first complaint and increasing the weight of a region after recurring complaints. Opt1 initially considers only target PD whereas Opt2 also takes into account hot spots. After patient complaints though, both limit PD in a region. Opt1 and Opt2 are evaluated in a phantom test, using patient models and during hyperthermia treatment. The phantom test and a sensitivity study in ten patient models, show that HTP-guided steering is most effective in peripheral complaint regions. Clinical evaluation in two groups of five patients shows that time between complaints is longer using Opt2 (p = 0.007). However, this does not lead to significantly different temperatures (T50s of 40.3 (Opt1) versus 40.1 degrees C (Opt2) (p = 0.898)). HTP-guided steering is feasible in terms of PD reduction in complaint regions and in time consumption. Opt2 is preferable in future use, because of better complaint reduction and control.
为了高效临床应用热疗治疗计划(HTP),需要优化方法。在本研究中,开发并测试了一种基于患者反馈的功率密度(PD)优化方法,作为盆腔肿瘤深部热疗中HTP引导式调整的工具。利用有限元模型预测患者体内的PD分布。应用两个目标函数Opt1和Opt2来优化PD分布。优化包括三个步骤:初始优化、首次反馈后的自适应优化以及反复反馈后增加某一区域的权重。Opt1最初仅考虑目标PD,而Opt2还考虑热点。然而,在患者反馈后,两者都会限制某一区域的PD。在体模测试、使用患者模型以及热疗治疗过程中对Opt1和Opt2进行了评估。体模测试和对十个患者模型的敏感性研究表明,HTP引导式调整在周边反馈区域最为有效。对两组各五名患者的临床评估表明,使用Opt2时反馈间隔时间更长(p = 0.007)。然而,这并未导致显著不同的温度(Opt1的T50为40.3℃,Opt2为40.1℃,p = 0.898)。就减少反馈区域的PD以及时间消耗而言,HTP引导式调整是可行的。由于能更好地减少和控制反馈,Opt2在未来使用中更具优势。