Suppr超能文献

对绘画的自由探索揭示了诵读困难者扫视运动的特别松散的关联。

Free exploration of painting uncovers particularly loose yoking of saccades in dyslexics.

作者信息

Kapoula Zoï, Ganem Rebecca, Poncet Sarah, Gintautas Daunys, Eggert Thomas, Brémond-Gignac Dominique, Bucci Maria Pia

机构信息

IRIS FRE3154 CNRS, Service Ophtalmologie-ORL-Stomatologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.

出版信息

Dyslexia. 2009 Aug;15(3):243-59. doi: 10.1002/dys.377.

Abstract

Binocular yoking of saccades is essential for single vision of words during reading. This study examines the quality of binocular coordination in individuals with dyslexia, independent of the process of reading. Fifteen dyslexia children (11.2+/-1.4 years) and 15 non-dyslexia individuals (8 children, aged 11.1+/-1.3 years, and 7 adults, 24+/-3 years) were studied. Eye movements were recorded in two conditions. In the control condition, participants made saccades to a single target where the saccade direction and magnitude were controlled. In the experimental condition saccades were allowed to move freely while viewing paintings. The results indicated that, compared with the non-dyslexia group, the dyslexia group showed a larger saccade amplitude difference between the two eyes, as well as a larger conjugate post-saccadic drift, during painting exploration than that for saccades to a single target. While both groups showed a larger disconjugate post-saccadic drift during painting exploration relative to the control condition, this showed a negative correlation with saccade disconjugacy (i.e. disconjugate drift reduced the disparity) only for the non-dyslexia group. These results indicate that individuals with dyslexia have problems of binocular coordination, both during the saccade and fixations, which are independent of the reading process. It is suggested that this reflects an immaturity of the normal oculomotor learning mechanisms.

摘要

扫视的双眼共轭对于阅读时单词的单眼视觉至关重要。本研究考察了阅读障碍个体的双眼协调质量,该研究独立于阅读过程。研究了15名阅读障碍儿童(11.2±1.4岁)和15名非阅读障碍个体(8名儿童,11.1±1.3岁,7名成年人,24±3岁)。在两种条件下记录眼动。在对照条件下,参与者向一个单目标进行扫视,其中扫视方向和幅度受到控制。在实验条件下,在观看绘画时允许扫视自由移动。结果表明,与非阅读障碍组相比,阅读障碍组在绘画探索过程中双眼之间的扫视幅度差异更大,以及共轭扫视后漂移更大,而相对于向单目标的扫视。虽然两组在绘画探索过程中相对于对照条件都表现出更大的非共轭扫视后漂移,但仅在非阅读障碍组中,这与扫视非共轭性呈负相关(即非共轭漂移减少了视差)。这些结果表明,阅读障碍个体在扫视和注视过程中都存在双眼协调问题,这与阅读过程无关。有人认为,这反映了正常眼动学习机制的不成熟。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验