Life Sciences Division, King's College London, University of London, Franklin Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, SE 1 8WA, London, UK.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 1999;6(4):225-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02987334.
Measurements of urban air quality at monitoring stations in developed countries have frequently involved the criteria gaseous pollutants, particulates, hazardous air pollutants, perceived air quality and relevant meteorological conditions. Large numbers of indicators have therefore been established to quantify emissions, concentrations and environmental and human health impacts of each of these groups of substances. To simplify the data for management, several indicators have been grouped together to form urban air quality indices but the weightings of individual variables is contentious. In industrialising and developing countries, data may be limited and traditional air pollutant indicators cannot often be constructed. The emphasis therefore has to be placed on the development of policy-relevant indicators, such as Response Indicators that reflect different policy principles for regulating air pollutant emissions. Indices that quantify the air quality management capabilities and capacities at the city level provide further useful decision-relevant tools. Four sets of indices, namely, 1. air quality measurement capacity, 2. data assessment and availability, 3. emissions estimates, and 4. management enabling capabilities, and a composite index to evaluate air quality management capability, were constructed and applied to 80 cities. The indices revealed that management capability varied widely between the cities. In some of the cities, existing national knowledge on urban air quality could have been more effectively used for management. It was concluded that for effective urban air quality management, a greater emphasis should be given, not just to monitoring and data capture programmes, but to the development of indicators and indices that empower decision-makers to initiate management response strategies. Over-reliance on restricted, predetermined sets of traditional air quality indicators should be avoided.
发达国家监测站对城市空气质量的测量通常涉及标准气态污染物、颗粒物、危险空气污染物、感知空气质量和相关气象条件。因此,建立了大量指标来量化这些物质组的排放、浓度以及对环境和人类健康的影响。为了简化管理数据,已经将一些指标分组形成城市空气质量指数,但个别变量的权重存在争议。在工业化和发展中国家,数据可能有限,并且通常无法构建传统的空气污染物指标。因此,必须重点开发与政策相关的指标,例如反映调节空气污染物排放的不同政策原则的响应指标。量化城市层面空气质量管理能力和容量的指数提供了进一步有用的决策相关工具。构建并应用了四组指数,即 1. 空气质量测量能力、2. 数据评估和可用性、3. 排放估计、4. 管理使能能力,以及一个综合指数来评估空气质量管理能力,对 80 个城市进行了评估。这些指数表明,城市之间的管理能力差异很大。在一些城市中,现有的国家城市空气质量知识本可以更有效地用于管理。结论是,为了进行有效的城市空气质量管理,不仅要重视监测和数据采集计划,还要重视开发指标和指数,使决策者能够制定管理应对策略。不应过度依赖有限的、预先确定的传统空气质量指标集。