Sung Paul S, Park Hyung-Soon
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Korea University, #1 Jeongneung 3-dong, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 136-703, Republic of Korea.
Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate whether gender differences exist in postural reaction when examining response time and amplitude of normalized ground reaction force (GRF) in subjects with low back pain (LBP). Alterations in GRF following sudden perturbations have led to an increased awareness of the postural compensatory mechanism. Although no specific perturbations have been shown to elicit gender differences, GRF can indirectly measure body sway increases more in subjects with LBP. Eighteen male and eighteen female subjects with LBP participated in this study. Subjects were exposed to sudden perturbations (unexpected and expected) by dropping a weighted ball onto a hand-held pan while subjects stood on the force plate. The amplitude of the normalized GRF and response time were calculated from the instance of perturbation to the first peak of the GRF response measured at the force plate. For the female subjects, the amplitude of the normalized GRF significantly decreased during expected perturbations (F(1,33)=4.23, p<0.04). However, the amplitude for the male subjects did not change during either type of perturbation. The response time was not significantly different between genders (F(1,33)=0.25, p=0.61). The male subjects were better able to stabilize their postural stability after an unexpected perturbation, which reveals postural integrity of compensatory mechanisms. These results indicated that gender differences exist when examining the amplitude of the normalized GRF following sudden perturbations for subjects with LBP.
这项横断面研究的目的是,在检查腰痛(LBP)患者的标准化地面反作用力(GRF)的反应时间和幅度时,调查姿势反应中是否存在性别差异。突然扰动后GRF的变化导致人们对姿势补偿机制的认识增加。尽管没有特定的扰动被证明会引发性别差异,但GRF可以间接测量LBP患者身体摇摆的增加。18名男性和18名女性LBP患者参与了这项研究。当受试者站在测力板上时,通过将一个加重球扔到手持平底锅上,使受试者受到突然扰动(意外和预期)。从扰动瞬间到在测力板上测量的GRF反应的第一个峰值计算标准化GRF的幅度和反应时间。对于女性受试者,在预期扰动期间,标准化GRF的幅度显著降低(F(1,33)=4.23,p<0.04)。然而,在任何一种扰动类型中,男性受试者的幅度都没有变化。性别之间的反应时间没有显著差异(F(1,33)=0.25,p=0.61)。男性受试者在意外扰动后能够更好地稳定其姿势稳定性,这揭示了补偿机制的姿势完整性。这些结果表明,在检查LBP患者突然扰动后标准化GRF的幅度时,存在性别差异。