• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多轴失语症系统(MAAS):失语症康复中的现实目标设定

MAAS (Multi-axial Aphasia System): realistic goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation.

作者信息

van de Sandt-Koenderman Wilhelmina M E, van Harskamp Frans, Duivenvoorden Hugo J, Remerie Sylvia C, van der Voort-Klees Yvonne A, Wielaert Sandra M, Ribbers Gerard M, Visch-Brink Evy G

机构信息

Rijndam Rehabilitation Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Dec;31(4):314-20. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f23.

DOI:10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f23
PMID:19008680
Abstract

Treatment success in aphasia is influenced by various factors. Clinical decisions, including patient selection and decisions on frequency and content, are often guided by a clinician's implicit opinions. The Multi-axial Aphasia System (MAAS) was developed to structure linguistic, somatic, neuropsychological, psychosocial and socio-economic information on five separate axes, enabling an explicit and interdisciplinary process of clinical decision-making. The objectives of this study were to investigate the potentialities of MAAS in predicting the outcome of cognitive-linguistic treatment. A group of 58 aphasic patients were investigated prospectively. All received cognitive-linguistic treatment during a randomized, controlled study on the efficacy of lexical semantic treatment. An interdisciplinary aphasia team rated the pretreatment MAAS profiles of all patients. The team was blinded for treatment allocation and outcome. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed with the posttreatment verbal communication score as the variable to be predicted and the overall MAAS rating, age and type of treatment as predictor variables. In a second multiple regression analysis, the ratings for each of the five MAAS axes were used as candidate predictors. The team's overall rating contributed significantly to the prediction of verbal communicative ability after linguistic treatment. Of the five MAAS axes, the neuropsychological axis contributed to the prediction. An interdisciplinary approach to aphasia assessment may contribute to realistic goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation. The results of this study stress the importance of neuropsychological assessment of aphasic patients before treatment.

摘要

失语症治疗的成功受到多种因素的影响。临床决策,包括患者选择以及治疗频率和内容的决策,往往受临床医生的隐性观点指导。多轴失语症系统(MAAS)旨在将语言、躯体、神经心理、心理社会和社会经济信息在五个独立轴上进行结构化整理,从而实现明确且跨学科的临床决策过程。本研究的目的是调查MAAS在预测认知语言治疗结果方面的潜力。对一组58名失语症患者进行了前瞻性研究。在一项关于词汇语义治疗疗效的随机对照研究中,所有患者均接受了认知语言治疗。一个跨学科失语症团队对所有患者治疗前的MAAS概况进行了评分。该团队对治疗分配和结果不知情。以治疗后的言语交流分数作为待预测变量,以MAAS总体评分、年龄和治疗类型作为预测变量进行多元线性回归分析。在第二次多元回归分析中,将MAAS五个轴各自的评分用作候选预测变量。该团队的总体评分对语言治疗后言语交际能力的预测有显著贡献。在MAAS的五个轴中,神经心理轴对预测有贡献。跨学科的失语症评估方法可能有助于失语症康复中设定切实可行的目标。本研究结果强调了治疗前对失语症患者进行神经心理评估的重要性。

相似文献

1
MAAS (Multi-axial Aphasia System): realistic goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation.多轴失语症系统(MAAS):失语症康复中的现实目标设定
Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Dec;31(4):314-20. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f23.
2
Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.语义治疗对中风后失语症患者言语交流和语言处理的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Stroke. 2004 Jan;35(1):141-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000105460.52928.A6. Epub 2003 Dec 4.
3
Lesion correlates of patholinguistic profiles in chronic aphasia: comparisons of syndrome-, modality- and symptom-level assessment.慢性失语症患者的病理语言学特征与病灶的相关性:综合征、模态和症状水平评估的比较。
Brain. 2014 Mar;137(Pt 3):918-30. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt374. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
4
Preliminary findings in a study of age, linguistic evolution and quality of life in recovery from aphasia.一项关于失语症康复中年龄、语言演变和生活质量的研究的初步结果。
Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1992;26:43-59.
5
Expert versus proxy rating of verbal communicative ability of people with aphasia after stroke.专家与代理评定脑卒中后失语症患者言语交流能力。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Nov;18(6):1064-70. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000811.
6
Communicative responsibility and semantic task in aphasia and "schizophasia".失语症和“精神分裂性言语”中的交际责任与语义任务。
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Oct;79(2):1027-39. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.2.1027.
7
Evaluation of quality of life in people with aphasia using a Dutch version of the SAQOL-39.使用荷兰版 SAQOL-39 评估失语症患者的生活质量。
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(3):173-82. doi: 10.3109/09638280903071867.
8
Non-verbal communication in severe aphasia: influence of aphasia, apraxia, or semantic processing?严重失语症中的非言语交流:是失语症、失用症还是语义处理的影响?
Cortex. 2012 Sep;48(8):952-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
9
Recovery from moderate aphasia in the first year poststroke: effect of type of therapy.中风后第一年中度失语症的恢复:治疗类型的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;82(8):1073-80. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25155.
10
A computerised communication aid in severe aphasia: an exploratory study.严重失语症患者的计算机化交流辅助工具:一项探索性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Nov 30;29(22):1701-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280601056178.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation: Prognostic Factors for Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes After Aphasia Therapy.预测语言康复的结果:失语症治疗后即时和长期结果的预后因素。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Mar 7;66(3):1068-1084. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00347. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
2
Attention to attention in aphasia - elucidating impairment patterns, modality differences and neural correlates.关注失语症中的注意力——阐明损伤模式、模态差异和神经相关性。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Dec 15;177:108413. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108413. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
Cognitive Training to Enhance Aphasia Therapy (Co-TrEAT): A Feasibility Study.
认知训练增强失语症治疗(Co-TrEAT):一项可行性研究。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Apr 5;3:815780. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.815780. eCollection 2022.
4
Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy.慢性失语症治疗反应的预测因素:为个性化失语症治疗奠定基础。
J Stroke. 2022 May;24(2):189-206. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.01102. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke.中风患者对语义性失语症与音韵性失语症疗法的个体化反应。
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 5;3(3):fcab174. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab174. eCollection 2021.
6
The verbal, non-verbal and structural bases of functional communication abilities in aphasia.失语症中功能性沟通能力的言语、非言语和结构基础。
Brain Commun. 2020 Aug 4;2(2):fcaa118. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa118. eCollection 2020.
7
Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.评估和绘制脑卒中失语症的语言、注意力和执行功能多维缺陷图。
Brain. 2019 Oct 1;142(10):3202-3216. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz258.
8
Attention in individuals with aphasia: Performance on the Conners' Continuous Performance Test - 2nd edition.失语症个体的注意力:康纳斯连续操作测验-第 2 版的表现。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Mar;30(2):249-265. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1460852. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Determining the Association between Language and Cognitive Tests in Poststroke Aphasia.确定中风后失语症患者语言与认知测试之间的关联。
Front Neurol. 2017 May 5;8:149. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00149. eCollection 2017.
10
Thinking on Treating Echolalia in Aphasia: Recommendations and Caveats for Future Research Directions.关于失语症中模仿言语治疗的思考:未来研究方向的建议与注意事项
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 3;11:164. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00164. eCollection 2017.