Omloo J M T, Law S Y K, Launois B, Le Prisé E, Wong J, van Berge Henegouwen M I, van Lanschot J J B
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Aug;35(8):793-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
Two major surgical strategies to improve survival rates after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer have emerged during the past decades; (limited) transhiatal oesophagectomy and (extended) transthoracic oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. This overview describes short and long-term advantages of these two strategies. In the short term, transhiatal oesophagectomy is accompanied by less morbidity. In the long term, this strategy is only preferable for patients with tumours located at the gastro-oesophageal junction, without involved lymph nodes in the proximal compartment of the chest. For patients with tumours located in the oesophagus, the transthoracic route with extended lymphadenectomy is probably preferred, because of improved long-term survival.
在过去几十年中,出现了两种提高食管癌食管切除术后生存率的主要手术策略;(有限的)经裂孔食管切除术和(扩大的)经胸食管切除术加两野淋巴结清扫术。本综述描述了这两种策略的短期和长期优势。短期内,经裂孔食管切除术的并发症较少。从长期来看,这种策略仅适用于位于胃食管交界处的肿瘤患者,且胸部近端区域的淋巴结未受累。对于位于食管的肿瘤患者,由于长期生存率提高,可能首选经胸途径加扩大淋巴结清扫术。