• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经裂孔食管切除术与经胸切除术及系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗食管癌的比较。

Transhiatal oesophagectomy compared with transthoracic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer.

作者信息

Horstmann O, Verreet P R, Becker H, Ohmann C, Röher H D

机构信息

Department of General and Trauma Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1995 Aug;161(8):557-67.

PMID:8519871
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of transhiatal oesophagectomy with those of transthoracic resection with systematic two field en bloc lymphadenectomy in the treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus.

DESIGN

Prospective open (non-random) study.

SETTING

University hospital, Germany.

SUBJECTS

87 patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus of whom 46 underwent transhiatal, and 41 transthoracic resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Morbidity and short and long term mortality.

RESULTS

The type of operation was chosen on clinical grounds, and the groups were comparable except for site and type of tumour, and nodal stage. The hospital mortality was 7/46 (15%) in the transhiatal group and 4/41 (10%) in the transthoracic group. The most common complication was anastomotic leak (23/46, 50%, compared with 10/41, 24%, p = 0.014), followed by major pulmonary complications (16/46, 35%, compared with 12/41, 29%), and cardiac complications (12/46, 26% compared with 11/41, 27%). Median survival was 350 days in the transhiatal group and 378 days in the transthoracic group. The percentage survival after one, two, and three years in the two groups was 48 and 55, 26 and 18, and 21 and 17, respectively. There were no significant differences in short or long term mortality.

CONCLUSION

We have been unable to show that the oncologically more radical procedure (transthoracic resection with systematic two field en bloc lymphadenectomy) results in longer survival, but we have shown that it can be done with similar morbidity and short term mortality. Because it is possible to stage the disease exactly with a transthoracic resection, and because published reports from other centres have hinted at improved prognosis after it, we shall continue to do the operation for suitable patients.

摘要

目的

比较经裂孔食管切除术与经胸切除术加系统性二野整块淋巴结清扫术治疗食管癌的效果。

设计

前瞻性开放性(非随机)研究。

地点

德国大学医院。

研究对象

87例食管癌患者,其中46例行经裂孔手术,41例行经胸切除术。

主要观察指标

发病率及短期和长期死亡率。

结果

手术方式根据临床情况选择,除肿瘤部位、类型及淋巴结分期外,两组具有可比性。经裂孔组医院死亡率为7/46(15%),经胸组为4/41(10%)。最常见的并发症是吻合口漏(23/46,50%,经胸组为10/41,24%,p = 0.014),其次是严重肺部并发症(16/46,35%,经胸组为12/41,29%)和心脏并发症(12/46,26%,经胸组为11/41,27%)。经裂孔组中位生存期为350天,经胸组为378天。两组1年、2年和3年生存率分别为48%和55%、26%和18%、21%和17%。短期和长期死亡率无显著差异。

结论

我们未能证明肿瘤学上更彻底的手术(经胸切除术加系统性二野整块淋巴结清扫术)能带来更长的生存期,但我们已表明其发病率和短期死亡率与之相似。由于经胸切除术能够准确分期疾病,且其他中心的已发表报告暗示术后预后有所改善,我们将继续为合适的患者进行该手术。

相似文献

1
Transhiatal oesophagectomy compared with transthoracic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer.经裂孔食管切除术与经胸切除术及系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗食管癌的比较。
Eur J Surg. 1995 Aug;161(8):557-67.
2
Transhiatal versus transthoracic resection for oesophageal carcinoma in Yemen.也门食管癌经裂孔与经胸切除术的比较
Singapore Med J. 2006 Jan;47(1):54-9.
3
Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial.与有限经裂孔切除术相比,扩大经胸段切除术治疗中/远端食管癌的随机临床试验五年生存率
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):992-1000; discussion 1000-1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c4037.
4
Short and long-term advantages of transhiatal and transthoracic oesophageal cancer resection.经裂孔和经胸食管癌切除术的短期和长期优势
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Aug;35(8):793-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
5
An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌手术结果的审计
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):536-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
6
A comparison of transthoracic and transhiatal resection for thoracic oesophageal cancer. Observations of 30 years.胸段食管癌经胸与经裂孔切除术的比较:30年观察
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1991;80(4):340-5.
7
Transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: standard versus extended two-field mediastinal lymphadenectomy?经胸食管癌切除术治疗食管腺癌:标准与扩大两野纵隔淋巴结清扫术的比较?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Apr;27(4):697-704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.022.
8
Oesophagectomy without thoracotomy: first 250 patients.非开胸食管切除术:首批250例患者
Eur J Surg. 1996 Jun;162(6):455-61.
9
Effectiveness of radical en-bloc-esophagectomy compared to transhiatal esophagectomy in squamous cell cancer of the esophagus is influenced by nodal micrometastases.与经胸食管切除术相比,根治性整块食管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效受淋巴结微转移的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun 1;93(7):541-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.20544.
10
En bloc esophagectomy reduces local recurrence and improves survival compared with transhiatal resection after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.对于食管腺癌新辅助治疗后,与经裂孔切除术相比,整块食管切除术可降低局部复发率并提高生存率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;135(6):1228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.082. Epub 2008 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer.微创手术在食管癌治疗中的影响
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(4):237-42. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202014000400003.
2
Perioperative therapy for esophageal cancer.食管癌的围手术期治疗
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;62(9):531-40. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0458-y. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
3
Surgery of esophageal cancer.食管癌手术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Feb;398(2):189-93. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1052-y. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
4
Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study.胸内吻合与颈部吻合治疗食管癌的对比:单中心研究中 72 例患者的配对分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug 6;10:159. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-159.
5
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance.微创食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌:胸腔镜与纵隔镜辅助的病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2073-7. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
6
Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution.胸段与经胸食管切除术治疗食管癌:单中心经验。
World J Surg. 2011 Jun;35(6):1296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1020-z.
7
Esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination into stomach: New technique to reduce fistula formation.食管胃吻合术内翻入胃:减少瘘形成的新技术。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec 7;16(45):5722-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5722.
8
Classification and early recognition of gastric conduit failure after minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术后胃代食管失败的分类与早期识别
Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2110-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0233-1. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
9
Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival.在发病率、死亡率和生存率方面,开放性经胸或经裂孔食管切除术与微创食管切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1681-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0009-4. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
10
Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.浅表性食管癌的外科治疗
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;391(4):304-21. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0063-3. Epub 2006 Jul 8.