Barbera Joseph
The Youthdale Child and Adolescent Sleep Centre, Ont., Canada.
Sleep Med. 2008 Dec;9(8):906-10. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
Theories as to the function of sleep and dreaming have been with us since the beginning of recorded history. In Ancient Greece and Rome the predominant view of dreams was that they were divine in origin. This view was held not only in theory but also in practice with the establishment of various dream-oracles and dream interpretation manuals (Oneirocritica). However, it is also in the Greek and Roman writings, paralleling advances in philosophy and natural science, that we begin to see the first rationalistic accounts of dreaming. This paper reviews the evolution of such rational accounts focusing on the influence of Democritus, who provides us with the first rationalistic account of dreaming in history, and Aristotle, who provides us with the most explicit account of sleep and dreaming in the ancient world.
自历史有记载以来,关于睡眠和做梦功能的理论就一直存在。在古希腊和罗马,关于梦的主流观点是其起源于神意。这种观点不仅在理论上存在,而且在实践中也有所体现,当时建立了各种解梦神谕和解梦手册(《梦占》)。然而,同样在希腊和罗马的著作中,随着哲学和自然科学的发展,我们开始看到对做梦的第一批理性解释。本文回顾了这些理性解释的演变,重点关注德谟克利特的影响,他为我们提供了历史上第一个关于做梦的理性解释,以及亚里士多德的影响,他为我们提供了古代世界关于睡眠和做梦最明确的解释。