• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务切换中的训练与迁移效应。

Training and transfer effects in task switching.

作者信息

Minear Meredith, Shah Priti

机构信息

Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1470-83. doi: 10.3758/MC.336.8.1470.

DOI:10.3758/MC.336.8.1470
PMID:19015506
Abstract

Performance on task switching, a paradigm commonly used to measure executive function, has been shown to improve with practice. However, no study has tested whether these benefits are specific to the tasks learned or are transferable to new situations. We report evidence of transferable improvement in a cued, randomly switching paradigm as measured by mixing cost, but we report no consistent improvement for switch cost. Improvement in mixing costs arises from a relative reduction in time to perform both switch and nonswitch trials that immediately follow switch trials, implicating the ability to recover from unexpected switches as the source of improvement. These results add to a growing number of studies demonstrating generalizable improvement with training on executive processing.

摘要

任务切换是一种常用于测量执行功能的范式,研究表明,通过练习,任务切换的表现会得到改善。然而,尚无研究测试这些益处是特定于所学任务,还是可转移到新情境中。我们报告了在一种提示性随机切换范式中,以混合成本衡量的可转移改善的证据,但未发现切换成本有一致的改善。混合成本的改善源于在紧接切换试验后的切换试验和非切换试验执行时间的相对减少,这表明从意外切换中恢复的能力是改善的来源。这些结果进一步补充了越来越多的研究,这些研究表明执行加工训练具有可推广的改善效果。

相似文献

1
Training and transfer effects in task switching.任务切换中的训练与迁移效应。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1470-83. doi: 10.3758/MC.336.8.1470.
2
Training and transfer effects of extensive task-switching training in students.学生广泛任务转换训练的培训和转移效应。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):389-403. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1059-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
3
Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training.跨模态转换后的听觉任务切换训练。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):1044-1061. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00911-x.
4
Investigation on the improvement and transfer of dual-task coordination skills.双任务协调技能的改进和转移研究。
Psychol Res. 2012 Nov;76(6):794-811. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0381-0. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
5
Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions.任务冲突对交替运行和提示任务切换中任务切换成本和任务混合成本的差异贡献:来自反应时间分布的前高斯建模的证据。
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):259-66. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0569-1. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
6
Task practice differentially modulates task-switching performance across the adult lifespan.任务练习对成年人整个生命周期内的任务切换表现有不同程度的调节作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):124-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
7
Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.支撑混合和转换成本的认知控制过程的电生理关联。
Brain Res. 2016 Sep 1;1646:160-173. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.048. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?线索提示任务切换范式中重要的是什么:任务还是线索?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):794-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193999.
9
Transfer of task-switching training in older age: the role of verbal processes.老年任务转换训练的转移:言语过程的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep;25(3):677-83. doi: 10.1037/a0019845.
10
Task switching and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.任务转换与注意力缺陷多动障碍。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000 Jun;28(3):213-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1005143419092.

引用本文的文献

1
Intensive task-switching training and single-task training differentially affect behavioral and neural manifestations of cognitive control in children.强化任务切换训练和单任务训练对儿童认知控制的行为和神经表现有不同影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2025 May 1;35(5). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf103.
2
The cost of perspective switching: Constraints on simultaneous activation.视角转换的代价:对同时激活的限制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jan 13. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02633-x.
3
Predictive alternating runs and random task-switching sequences produce dissociative switch costs in the Consonant-Vowel/Odd-Even task.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm.任务切换范式中认知控制的预备性调整。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):334-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03193853.
2
Mixing costs in task shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multicomponent task.任务转移中的混合成本反映了多组件任务中的顺序处理阶段。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1484-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03193380.
3
Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.联合学习对任务集转换中年龄差异的影响。
在辅音-元音/奇偶任务中,预测性交替序列和随机任务切换序列会产生分离性切换成本。
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb;26(1):157-170. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01236-7. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Task Switching: On the Relation of Cognitive Flexibility with Cognitive Capacity.任务切换:认知灵活性与认知能力的关系
J Intell. 2023 Mar 30;11(4):68. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040068.
5
Providing choice of feedback affects perceived choice but does not affect performance.提供反馈选择会影响感知选择,但不会影响表现。
PeerJ. 2022 Jun 28;10:e13631. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13631. eCollection 2022.
6
A multimodal analysis of sustained attention in younger and older adults.多模态分析年轻人和老年人的持续性注意力。
Psychol Aging. 2022 May;37(3):307-325. doi: 10.1037/pag0000687. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control dataset, a theoretically-guided within-subject task fMRI battery.认知控制的双重机制数据集,一个基于理论指导的被试内任务 fMRI 电池。
Sci Data. 2022 Mar 29;9(1):114. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01226-4.
8
The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Project.认知控制项目的双重机制
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Aug 12:1-26. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01768.
9
Frontoparietal pattern similarity analyses of cognitive control in monozygotic twins.同卵双胞胎认知控制的额顶模式相似性分析。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 1;241:118415. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118415. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Cross-Modal Transfer Following Auditory Task-Switching Training in Old Adults.老年人听觉任务转换训练后的跨模态转移
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;12:615518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615518. eCollection 2021.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Nov;123(3):187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
4
Training effects on dual-task performance: are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control?训练对双重任务表现的影响:注意力控制可塑性是否存在与年龄相关的差异?
Psychol Aging. 2005 Dec;20(4):695-709. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.695.
5
On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm.关于线索提示任务切换范式中任务混合成本的起源
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1477-91. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477.
6
Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention.训练、成熟以及基因对执行性注意力发展的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 11;102(41):14931-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506897102. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
7
Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.在不切换任务的情况下模拟任务切换:对明确提示表现的短期启动解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):343-67. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343.
8
Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.使用随机任务序列探索任务集重新配置。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Mar;118(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.015. Epub 2004 Nov 25.
9
A working memory workout: how to expand the focus of serial attention from one to four items in 10 hours or less.工作记忆训练:如何在10小时或更短时间内将序列注意力的焦点从一项扩展到四项。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1322-37. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1322.
10
Parkinson's disease is associated with goal setting deficits during task switching.帕金森病与任务转换过程中的目标设定缺陷有关。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Apr;54(3):260-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.043.