Prior Mathew, Guerin Michelle, Grimmer-Somers Karen
Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):888-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01014.x.
To establish the effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies. Data sources/study setting Systematic reviews in full text, English language, 1987-2007, reporting any measure of clinical process change or cost-benefit analysis.
Overview of secondary evidence
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Independent critical appraisal using AMSTAR, primary author undertaking all data extraction using a purpose-built form. Principal findings We identified 144 potential papers, from which 33 systematic reviews were included. These reflected 714 primary studies involving 22 512 clinicians, in a range of health care settings. Implementation strategies were varied, rarely comparable, with variable outcomes. Effective implementation strategies included multifaceted interventions, interactive education and clinical reminder systems. Didactic education and passive dissemination strategies were ineffective. Cost-effectiveness studies were rare.
Successful guideline implementation strategies should be multifaceted, and actively engage clinicians throughout the process.
确定临床指南实施策略的有效性。数据来源/研究背景 1987 - 2007年全文发表的英文系统评价,报告临床过程变化的任何指标或成本效益分析。
二次证据综述
数据收集/提取方法:使用AMSTAR进行独立严格评价,第一作者使用特制表格进行所有数据提取。主要发现 我们识别出144篇潜在论文,从中纳入了33篇系统评价。这些系统评价反映了714项涉及22512名临床医生的原始研究,涵盖一系列医疗保健环境。实施策略各不相同,很少具有可比性,结果也各异。有效的实施策略包括多方面干预、互动式教育和临床提醒系统。讲授式教育和被动传播策略无效。成本效益研究很少。
成功的指南实施策略应是多方面的,并在整个过程中积极让临床医生参与。