• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家汽车抽样系统(NASS)中速度变化量误差对正面碰撞风险计算的影响。

Effect of delta-V errors in NASS on frontal crash risk calculations.

作者信息

Funk James R, Cormier Joseph M, Gabler Hampton C

机构信息

Biodynamic Research Corporation, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:155-64.

PMID:19026232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3256761/
Abstract

The most important factor in predicting the risk of injury or death in a frontal crash is the crash severity, which is expressed as the velocity change, or delta-V, experienced by the vehicle during the crash. The National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) is the largest database in the world linking injury outcomes with delta-Vs, which are obtained from field reconstructions. The accuracy of these reconstructions was assessed by analyzing 228 NASS cases involving single event frontal crashes in which the vehicle's frontal delta-V was also measured directly by an onboard event data recorder (EDR). Compared to the EDR measurements, the delta-V values in NASS averaged 19% lower with a standard deviation of 8.6 kph. The effect of this error on injury and fatality risk calculations was investigated using NASS data from 1997 - 2006 for frontal crashes with a known delta-V. Injury and fatality risk functions were calculated by curve fitting the distributions of the delta-V values associated with injury and fatality incidence normalized by the fitted crash exposure distribution. Individual delta-V values were linearly scaled to correct for the bias error, and the delta-V distributions were corrected for scatter error using a numerical deconvolution technique. Correcting for delta-V bias error shifted the calculated risk curves to the right and correcting for delta-V scatter error shifted the curves back to the left, but to a lesser extent. The effects of occupant age, gender, and belt use on injury and fatality risk were substantial.

摘要

预测正面碰撞中受伤或死亡风险的最重要因素是碰撞严重程度,它表示为车辆在碰撞过程中经历的速度变化,即速度增量(delta-V)。国家汽车抽样系统(NASS)是世界上最大的将伤害结果与速度增量联系起来的数据库,这些速度增量是通过现场重建获得的。通过分析228例涉及单一事件正面碰撞的NASS案例评估了这些重建的准确性,在这些案例中,车辆的正面速度增量也由车载事件数据记录器(EDR)直接测量。与EDR测量值相比,NASS中的速度增量值平均低19%,标准差为8.6公里/小时。利用1997年至2006年NASS中已知速度增量的正面碰撞数据,研究了这种误差对伤害和死亡风险计算的影响。通过对与伤害和死亡发生率相关的速度增量值分布进行曲线拟合来计算伤害和死亡风险函数,该分布通过拟合的碰撞暴露分布进行归一化。对各个速度增量值进行线性缩放以校正偏差误差,并使用数值反卷积技术对速度增量分布进行散射误差校正。校正速度增量偏差误差使计算出的风险曲线向右移动,校正速度增量散射误差使曲线向左移动,但程度较小。乘员年龄、性别和安全带使用情况对伤害和死亡风险的影响很大。

相似文献

1
Effect of delta-V errors in NASS on frontal crash risk calculations.国家汽车抽样系统(NASS)中速度变化量误差对正面碰撞风险计算的影响。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:155-64.
2
Evaluation of NASS-CDS side crash delta-V estimates using event data recorders.利用事故数据记录器评估 NASS-CDS 侧面碰撞 delta-V 估计值。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(8):827-34. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.881995.
3
Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Crash Severity Metrics.基于车辆的碰撞严重程度指标评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S132-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1067693.
4
Injury risk curves in far-side lateral motor vehicle crashes by AIS level, body region and injury code.按损伤严重程度评分(AIS)等级、身体部位和损伤代码划分的远侧横向机动车碰撞中的损伤风险曲线。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020 Oct 12;21(sup1):S112-S117. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1880006. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
5
Estimated injury risk for specific injuries and body regions in frontal motor vehicle crashes.正面机动车碰撞中特定损伤和身体部位的估计受伤风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S108-16. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1012664.
6
Injury mechanisms and severity in narrow offset frontal impacts.窄偏移量正面碰撞中的损伤机制与严重程度。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:185-9.
7
Rear-seat occupant demographics in rear impacts: Analysis of NASS-CDS.后碰撞中后排乘客特征:NASS-CDS 分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(3):218-223. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1871474. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Estimating near side crash injury risk in best performing passenger vehicles in the United States.估计美国表现最佳乘用车的近侧碰撞伤害风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105434. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105434. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Real-world injury patterns associated with Hybrid III sternal deflections in frontal crash tests.真实世界中与 Hybrid III 胸骨挠度相关的正面碰撞试验中的损伤模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(8):807-15. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.766825.
10
NASS/CDS delta-V estimates: the influence of enhancements to the WinSmash crash reconstruction code.美国国家航空航天安全委员会/民用航空局速度变化估计:对WinSmash碰撞重建代码增强的影响
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:91-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of acute cervical and lumbar pathology in common types of motor vehicle collisions: a retrospective record review.常见类型机动车碰撞中急性颈部和腰部病变的发生率:一项回顾性记录审查
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Nov 9;18(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1797-5.
2
Injury risk functions in frontal impacts using data from crash pulse recorders.利用碰撞脉冲记录仪的数据得出的正面碰撞中的伤害风险函数。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:267-76.
3
EMS Provider assessment of vehicle damage compared with assessment by a professional crash reconstructionist.EMS 提供者对车辆损坏的评估与专业事故重建人员的评估比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):483-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.598614. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical risk estimates for mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤的生物力学风险评估。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:343-61.
2
The accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates: the influence of vehicle type, stiffness, and impact mode.WinSmash速度增量估计的准确性:车辆类型、刚度和碰撞模式的影响。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006;50:73-89.
3
Characteristics of crashes that increase the risk of serious injuries.增加严重受伤风险的碰撞事故特征。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:561-76.
4
Driver injury and fatality risk in two-car crashes versus mass ratio inferred using Newtonian mechanics.使用牛顿力学推断两车碰撞中驾驶员受伤和死亡风险与质量比的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Oct;26(5):609-16. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90022-1.