• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估计美国表现最佳乘用车的近侧碰撞伤害风险。

Estimating near side crash injury risk in best performing passenger vehicles in the United States.

机构信息

Virginia Tech, 325 Stanger St., Kelly Hall 440 MC 0194, 24061, Blacksburg, United States.

Virginia Tech, 325 Stanger St., Kelly Hall 440 MC 0194, 24061, Blacksburg, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105434. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105434. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105434
PMID:32105838
Abstract

The objective of this paper was to develop an injury risk model relating real world injury outcomes in near-side crashes with U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) test performance, crash, and occupant properties. The study was motivated by the longer-term goal of predicting injury outcomes in a future fleet in which all vehicles are expected to have passive safety performance equivalent to a 5-star NCAP rating level (the highest star rating and lowest risk of injury). The dataset used to evaluate injury risk was the National Automotive Sampling System / Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS). Case years 2010-2015 were used. An injured occupant was defined as a vehicle occupant who experienced an injury of maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of 2 or greater, or who were fatally injured. Injury severity was scored using AIS-2005 (2008 update). Cases were selected in which front-row occupants of late-model vehicles were exposed to a near-side crash. Logistic regression was used to develop an injury model with delta-v, belt status, age, and gender as predictor variables. The side crash performance of each vehicle was identified and added to the model by matching each case with the associated performance in the NCAP moving deformable barrier side impact crash test. NCAP MDB test performance, delta-v, and occupant age, sex, and BMI were found to be significant predictors of injury risk. The effect of a 5 % higher risk in the MDB test (approximately one star rating worse) was comparable to a 2.84 km/h increase in delta-v. This model informs the development of active safety systems in a future fleet where vehicle passive safety performance is higher, quantified by the NCAP MDB test.

摘要

本文的目的是建立一个与美国新车评估计划(NCAP)测试性能、碰撞和乘员特性相关的近侧碰撞伤害风险模型,以预测未来所有车辆都具有相当于 5 星级 NCAP 评级水平(最高星级和最低伤害风险)的被动安全性能的情况下的伤害结果。用于评估伤害风险的数据集中的近侧碰撞数据来自国家汽车抽样系统/耐撞性数据系统(NASS/CDS)。使用了 2010-2015 年的案例年。受伤乘员被定义为经历过最大损伤严重度评分(AIS)为 2 或更高的车辆乘员,或遭受致命伤害的车辆乘员。使用 AIS-2005(2008 年更新)对伤害严重度进行评分。选择了前排座位的后排乘客暴露在近侧碰撞中的案例。使用逻辑回归方法,将 delta-v、安全带状态、年龄和性别作为预测变量,建立了伤害模型。通过将每个案例与 NCAP 移动变形壁障侧面碰撞测试的相关性能进行匹配,确定了每辆车的侧面碰撞性能,并将其添加到模型中。NCAP MDB 测试性能、delta-v 以及乘员年龄、性别和 BMI 被发现是伤害风险的显著预测因素。在 MDB 测试中增加 5%的风险(大约一个星级的降低)的效果与 delta-v 增加 2.84km/h 的效果相当。这个模型为未来车辆的主动安全系统的发展提供了信息,这些车辆的被动安全性能更高,由 NCAP MDB 测试量化。

相似文献

1
Estimating near side crash injury risk in best performing passenger vehicles in the United States.估计美国表现最佳乘用车的近侧碰撞伤害风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105434. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105434. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
2
Association Between NCAP Ratings and Real-World Rear Seat Occupant Risk of Injury.新车评估计划(NCAP)评级与现实世界中后排乘客受伤风险之间的关联
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S146-52. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061664.
3
Crash test rating and likelihood of major thoracoabdominal injury in motor vehicle crashes: the new car assessment program side-impact crash test, 1998-2010.汽车碰撞中碰撞测试评级和严重胸腹损伤的可能性:新车评估计划侧面碰撞测试,1998-2010 年。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):750-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aafd5b.
4
Rear seat safety: Variation in protection by occupant, crash and vehicle characteristics.后排座椅安全:乘客、碰撞和车辆特征对保护效果的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
5
Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Crash Severity Metrics.基于车辆的碰撞严重程度指标评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S132-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1067693.
6
Occurrence of serious injury in real-world side impacts of vehicles with good side-impact protection ratings.具有良好侧面碰撞保护评级的车辆在现实世界侧面碰撞中严重伤害的发生率。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S125-32. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1020112.
7
IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.IIHS 侧面碰撞测试评级与现实碰撞中的乘员死亡风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):500-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.585671.
8
Preventing passenger vehicle occupant injuries by vehicle design--a historical perspective from IIHS.通过车辆设计预防乘用车驾乘人员受伤——美国公路安全保险协会的历史视角
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Apr;10(2):113-26. doi: 10.1080/15389580802486225.
9
Side Impact Regulatory Trends, Crash Environment and Injury Risk in the USA.美国的侧面碰撞监管趋势、碰撞环境与受伤风险
Stapp Car Crash J. 2015 Nov;59:91-112. doi: 10.4271/2015-22-0004.
10
Rollover injury in vehicles with high-strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) roofs, curtain and side airbags, and other safety improvements.在配备高强度重量比(SWR)车顶、窗帘式和侧面安全气囊以及其他安全改进措施的车辆中的翻滚损伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):734-740. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1482489. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Contributing factors to near-miss experiences of motorcyclists in Thailand: A random parameter probit model approach.泰国摩托车骑行者险些发生事故经历的促成因素:一种随机参数概率单位模型方法。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 25;9(12):e22625. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22625. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Risk factors affecting severe thoracic injuries in motor vehicle collisions based on age group and collision directions.基于年龄组和碰撞方向的影响机动车碰撞致严重胸部损伤的危险因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2429-2437. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02297-7. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
3
Age-based variability in the association between restraint use and injury type and severity in multi-occupant crashes.
基于年龄的变化,在多乘员事故中约束装置的使用与伤害类型和严重程度之间的关联。
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;76:114-120.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Oct 14.