Lucas Michel, Asselin Geneviève, Mérette Chantal, Poulin Marie-Josée, Dodin Sylvie
Saint-François d'Assise Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Menopause. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):357-66. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181865386.
To compare the effects of enriched ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid (E-EPA) omega-3 fatty acid supplementation with those of placebo on hot flashes (HFs) and quality of life among middle-aged women.
Women were considered for participation if they were between 40 and 55 years of age and had moderate to severe psychological distress. A total of 120 women were randomly assigned to E-EPA or placebo for 8 weeks. Only women with HFs were included in this analysis (E-EPA, n = 45; placebo, n = 46). Outcomes were changes from baseline to week 8 postintervention regarding hot flash (HF) frequency (number of HFs per day), intensity and score (frequency x intensity), and Menopause-specific Quality of Life questionnaire scores.
At baseline, the average number of HFs was 2.8 per day. After 8 weeks, HF frequency and score decreased significantly in the E-EPA group compared with the placebo group. There was no difference in the change in HF intensity between groups. Frequency of HFs declined by a mean of 1.58 per day (95% CI, -2.18 to -0.98) in the E-EPA group and by 0.50 per day (95% CI, -1.20 to 0.20) in the placebo group. The odds of being a responder among those taking E-EPA were about three times greater than among those taking placebo (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.03-7.03; P = 0.04). Menopause-Specific Quality of Life scores improved significantly over time in both groups but no significant differences were noted between them.
Supplementation with E-EPA omega-3 fatty acid reduced HF frequency and improved the HF score relative to placebo. These results need to be confirmed by a clinical trial specifically designed to evaluate HFs in more symptomatic women.
比较富含二十碳五烯酸乙酯(E-EPA)的ω-3脂肪酸补充剂与安慰剂对中年女性潮热(HFs)及生活质量的影响。
年龄在40至55岁之间且有中度至重度心理困扰的女性可考虑参与。总共120名女性被随机分配至E-EPA组或安慰剂组,为期8周。本分析仅纳入有潮热症状的女性(E-EPA组,n = 45;安慰剂组,n = 46)。观察指标为干预后第8周相对于基线的潮热(HF)频率(每日潮热次数)、强度及评分(频率×强度)变化,以及更年期特异性生活质量问卷评分。
基线时,平均每日潮热次数为2.8次。8周后,与安慰剂组相比,E-EPA组的潮热频率及评分显著降低。两组间潮热强度变化无差异。E-EPA组潮热频率平均每日下降1.58次(95%CI,-2.18至-0.98),安慰剂组平均每日下降0.50次(95%CI,-1.20至0.20)。服用E-EPA者出现反应的几率约为服用安慰剂者的三倍(优势比,2.70;95%CI,1.03 - 7.03;P = 0.04)。两组更年期特异性生活质量评分均随时间显著改善,但两组间无显著差异。
相对于安慰剂,补充E-EPAω-3脂肪酸可降低潮热频率并改善潮热评分。这些结果需要通过专门设计用于评估症状更明显女性潮热情况的临床试验来证实。