• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊患者与医生在对医生同理心认知上的差异:对医学教育的启示

Differences between emergency patients and their doctors in the perception of physician empathy: implications for medical education.

作者信息

Lin C-S, Hsu M-Y F, Chong C-F

机构信息

School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Hsinchuang, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008 Jul;21(2):144. Epub 2008 Aug 23.

PMID:19039746
Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES

Conveying empathy is a multi-phase process involving an inner resonation phase, communication phase, and reception phase. Previous investigations on physician empathy have focused on a physician's inner resonation phase or communication phase and not on the patient's reception phase. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in the perception of physicians' empathy between emergency physicians (EPs) and their patients. The answer to this question will allow us to more fully understand all phases of empathy and will help guide the teaching of how to effectively communicate empathy in the clinical setting.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2005, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 7 each of EPs, patients, patients' family members and nurses. A phenomenological approach was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the analysis: (1) When patients expressed their feelings, EPs usually did not resonate with their concerns; (2) Patients needed EPs to provide psychological comfort, but EPs focused only on patients' physical discomfort; (3) Patients needed appropriate feedback from EPs, but EPs did not reflect on whether their patients had received empathy from them; (4) EPs' ability to empathize was affected by environmental factors, which EPs found difficult to overcome.

CONCLUSION

EPs and their patients perceive the physicians' empathy differently. These findings provide insights into patients' perceptions of their physicians' empathic expressions and provide a framework for teaching physicians how to convey empathy in the emergency department setting.

摘要

背景与目的

传达同理心是一个多阶段的过程,包括内心共鸣阶段、沟通阶段和接收阶段。以往对医生同理心的研究主要集中在医生的内心共鸣阶段或沟通阶段,而不是患者的接收阶段。本研究的目的是调查急诊医生(EP)与其患者对医生同理心认知的差异。对这个问题的回答将使我们更全面地理解同理心的所有阶段,并有助于指导在临床环境中有效传达同理心的教学。

方法

2004年至2005年,我们对7名急诊医生、患者、患者家属和护士分别进行了深入的半结构化访谈。采用现象学方法分析数据。

结果

分析得出四个主题:(1)当患者表达自己的感受时,急诊医生通常不会对他们的担忧产生共鸣;(2)患者需要急诊医生提供心理安慰,但急诊医生只关注患者的身体不适;(3)患者需要急诊医生给出适当的反馈,但急诊医生没有反思他们的患者是否从他们那里感受到了同理心;(4)急诊医生的同理心能力受到环境因素的影响,急诊医生发现这些因素很难克服。

结论

急诊医生及其患者对医生同理心的认知不同。这些发现为了解患者对医生同理心表达的看法提供了见解,并为教导医生如何在急诊科环境中传达同理心提供了一个框架。

相似文献

1
Differences between emergency patients and their doctors in the perception of physician empathy: implications for medical education.急诊患者与医生在对医生同理心认知上的差异:对医学教育的启示
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008 Jul;21(2):144. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
2
Patients' perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement.患者对急诊科护理质量的认知以及质量改进领域的确定。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):1045-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x.
3
Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter?患者参与专科医疗会诊:医生以患者为中心的沟通是否重要?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.011. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
4
Relationships between scores on the Jefferson Scale of physician empathy, patient perceptions of physician empathy, and humanistic approaches to patient care: a validity study.医生共情杰斐逊量表得分、患者对医生共情的认知以及患者人文关怀方法之间的关系:一项效度研究
Med Sci Monit. 2007 Jul;13(7):CR291-4.
5
Communicating in the "gray zone": perceptions about emergency physician hospitalist handoffs and patient safety.在“灰色地带”进行沟通:关于急诊科医生与住院医生交接班及患者安全的认知
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):884-94. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.037.
6
Trauma patients' encounters with the team in the emergency department--a qualitative study.创伤患者在急诊科与团队的接触——一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):714-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
7
The development of a scale to discover outpatients' perceptions of the relative desirability of different elements of doctors' communication behaviours.开发一种量表,以了解门诊患者对医生沟通行为不同要素相对可取性的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.015. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
8
Discrepancy between physicians' perceptions and practices during pelvic examinations in Taiwan.台湾地区妇科检查中医师认知与实际操作之间的差异。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
9
The impact of gender stereotypes on the evaluation of general practitioners' communication skills: an experimental study using transcripts of physician-patient encounters.性别刻板印象对全科医生沟通技巧评估的影响:一项使用医患交流记录的实验研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.013. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
10
Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy: preliminary psychometric data.杰斐逊患者对医生同理心认知量表:初步心理测量数据。
Croat Med J. 2007 Feb;48(1):81-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Healthcare Relationship during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study in the Emergency Department of an Italian Hospital.《COVID-19 大流行第二波期间的医疗保健关系:意大利一家医院急诊科的定性研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3):2072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032072.
2
Implementation, results and face validity of the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure in a Canadian department of surgery.加拿大外科部门中咨询和关系同理心测量的实施、结果和表面有效性。
Can J Surg. 2022 Nov 8;65(6):E749-E755. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003721. Print 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
Development and Initial Validity of the Patients' Literacy Scale Among Outpatients in Hangzhou City, China.
中国杭州市门诊患者识字量表的编制及初步效度研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 7;16:2483-2496. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S379259. eCollection 2022.
4
Predictors of Physician Compassion, Empathy, and Related Constructs: a Systematic Review.预测医师的同情心、同理心和相关概念:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):900-911. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07055-2. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Perception of Physician Empathy Varies With Educational Level and Gender of Patients Undergoing Low-Yield Computerized Tomographic Imaging.接受低收益计算机断层扫描成像的患者对医生同理心的感知因教育水平和性别而异。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Jun;7(3):386-394. doi: 10.1177/2374373519838529. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
The medical consultation through the lenses of language and social interaction theory.从语言和社会互动理论看医疗咨询。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Mar;25(1):241-257. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-09873-2. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Differences between GP perception of delivered empathy and patient-perceived empathy: a cross-sectional study in primary care.全科医生感知的同理心与患者感知的同理心之间的差异:初级保健中的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):e621-e626. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X698381. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
8
Cynicism and other attitudes towards patients in an emergency department in a middle eastern tertiary care center.中东三级护理中心急诊科对患者的愤世嫉俗及其他态度
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 29;16:36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0539-y.
9
Emergency department provider preferences related to clinical practice guidelines for tobacco cessation: a multicenter survey.急诊科医务人员对戒烟临床实践指南的偏好:一项多中心调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):785-93. doi: 10.1111/acem.12421. Epub 2014 Aug 11.