Suppr超能文献

用于确定类风湿性关节炎结局以及治疗成败的拟议指标。

Proposed metrics for the determination of rheumatoid arthritis outcome and treatment success and failure.

作者信息

Wolfe Frederick, Michaud Kaleb

机构信息

National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, 1035 N. Emporia, Suite 288, Wichita, KS 67214, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):27-33. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080591.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their physicians often disagree as to the success of RA treatment or RA outcomes. However, guidelines (such as EULAR criteria for DAS scores) are heavily weighted toward joint counts and laboratory tests, and no guidelines exist for patient reported outcomes. Our aims were (1) to provide a patient-based definition of successful RA outcome or of treatment success and failure; (2) to describe the characteristics of patients meeting this definition; (3) to describe how external states such as disability and comorbidity influence definitions of health outcome; and (4) to derive surrogate-measure cutpoints for the definition.

METHODS

A total of 20,268 patients with RA (5132 without comorbidity) were studied by recursive partitioning and regression methods to determine best dividing points between RA treatment and outcome success and non-success using 0-10 visual analog scales (VAS) for patient global assessment, pain, fatigue, and RA activity, and a Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scale.

RESULTS

14.5% of all patients and 22.9% of those without comorbidity were very satisfied with their health (success). Patient global at a level<or=1.25 best separated success from failure. Mean and median scores for those who were very satisfied were HAQ (0-3 scale) 0.36, 0.12; pain (0-10) 1.1, 0.5; global (0-10) 0.9, 0.5; and fatigue (0-10) 1.5, 1.0. VAS scores increased by approximately 0.5 units for each comorbid condition.

CONCLUSION

Patient global at a level<or=1.25 best separates patients who are very satisfied with their health from those not very satisfied, regardless of the presence of comorbidity. All scores increase with increasing comorbidity, which must be accounted for when assessing individual patients. Values identified here suggest patients require better outcomes than are found in patients who are in Disease Activity Score-28 remission or OMERACT low disease activity states.

摘要

目的

类风湿关节炎(RA)患者及其医生对于RA治疗的成功与否或RA的治疗结果常常存在分歧。然而,现有指南(如欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)关于疾病活动度评分的标准)严重侧重于关节计数和实验室检查,尚无针对患者报告结局的指南。我们的目的是:(1)基于患者给出RA治疗成功或失败以及RA结局成功或失败的定义;(2)描述符合该定义的患者特征;(3)描述残疾和合并症等外部状况如何影响健康结局的定义;(4)得出该定义的替代测量切点。

方法

通过递归划分和回归方法对总共20268例RA患者(5132例无合并症)进行研究,使用0至10的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者整体状况、疼痛、疲劳和RA活动度,并采用健康评估问卷(HAQ)量表,以确定RA治疗及结局成功与失败之间的最佳分界点。

结果

所有患者中有14.5%以及无合并症患者中有22.9%对自身健康状况非常满意(治疗成功)。患者整体状况评分为≤1.25时能最佳区分成功与失败。非常满意患者的HAQ(0至3分制)平均得分和中位数得分分别为0.36、0.12;疼痛(0至10分)为1.1、0.5;整体状况(0至10分)为0.9、0.5;疲劳(0至10分)为1.5、1.0。每增加一种合并症,VAS评分约增加0.5个单位。

结论

无论是否存在合并症,患者整体状况评分为≤1.25时能最佳区分对自身健康非常满意的患者与不太满意的患者。所有评分均随合并症增加而升高,在评估个体患者时必须考虑这一点。此处确定的值表明,患者需要比处于疾病活动度评分-28缓解或OMERACT低疾病活动状态的患者更好的治疗结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验