Wheat John R, Brandon John E, Leeper James D, Jackson James R, Boulware Dennis W
Community and Rural Medicine, University of Alabama College of Community Health Sciences, Al, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2007;12(4):51-61. doi: 10.1080/10599240801985951.
A pipeline model has been suggested to increase the rural physician supply. This study is an institutional case report used to describe the context, development, and in-house evaluation of the University of Alabama Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990-2005. This program was developed at a University of Alabama School of Medicine branch campus to target rural students at multiple levels, elementary schools through residency, and includes a minority focus. Requirements to enter the medical program include living 8 years in rural Alabama, meeting admission requirements, and affinity for rural lifestyles. Twenty-six percent of 316 high school participants, all 40 students in the minority-focused college program, and 3% of 90 medical program students were African American. The program includes (1) puppet shows in elementary schools depicting different health professions, (2) Rural Health Scholars Program for 11th-grade students, (3) Minority Rural Health Pipeline Program for college students, (4) Rural Medical Scholars Program, a 5-year track of study in rural community health and medicine, and (5) assured admission to family medicine residency. Outcomes studied in this case report included medical school performance, graduation rate, selection of family medicine specialty, and rural practice location. Medical scholars were anticipated to experience academic difficulty, select family medicine specialty, and locate in rural practice more often than peers. Compared to peers, medical scholars showed lower scores on preclinical courses and USMLE steps 1 and 2, reflective of their lower MCAT and GPA scores, but had (1) similar graduation rates (95% vs peers 84%), (2) higher family medicine selection rate (47% vs Huntsville 27% vs Tuscaloosa 12% vs Birmingham 4% [OR compared to Birmingham 22.7, 95% CI 10.5-49.4]), and (3) higher rural practice rate (67% vs peers 14% vs national group 9%) in the first RMSP classes. Based on these important outcomes being better than or equal to the traditional student cohorts, the institution concluded that the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline demonstrates successful use of the rural pipeline model.
有人提出了一种培养模式以增加农村地区医生的供应。本研究是一份机构案例报告,用于描述阿拉巴马大学农村卫生领袖培养计划(1990 - 2005年)的背景、发展情况及内部评估。该计划是在阿拉巴马大学医学院的一个分校制定的,旨在针对多个层次的农村学生,从小学到住院医师阶段,并特别关注少数族裔。进入医学项目的要求包括在阿拉巴马农村生活8年、符合入学要求以及对农村生活方式有兴趣。316名高中参与者中有26%是非洲裔美国人,所有40名参加以少数族裔为重点的大学项目的学生都是非洲裔美国人,90名医学项目学生中有3%是非洲裔美国人。该计划包括:(1)在小学举办的木偶戏表演,展示不同的健康职业;(2)面向11年级学生的农村卫生学者计划;(3)面向大学生的少数族裔农村卫生培养计划;(4)农村医学学者计划,这是一个为期5年的农村社区卫生与医学学习课程;(5)保证被家庭医学住院医师项目录取。本案例报告中研究的结果包括医学院的学习成绩、毕业率、家庭医学专业的选择以及农村执业地点。预计医学学者比同龄人更容易在学业上遇到困难、选择家庭医学专业并在农村执业。与同龄人相比,医学学者在临床前课程以及美国医师执照考试第1步和第2步中的成绩较低,这反映了他们较低的医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩和平均绩点(GPA),但在首批农村医学学者计划班级中,他们有以下情况:(1)毕业率相似(95%,同龄人毕业率为84%);(2)选择家庭医学专业的比例更高(47%,亨茨维尔为27%,塔斯卡卢萨为12%,伯明翰为4%[与伯明翰相比的优势比为22.7,95%置信区间为10.5 - 49.4]);(3)在农村执业的比例更高(67%,同龄人执业比例为14%,全国组为9%)。基于这些重要结果优于或等同于传统学生群体,该机构得出结论,农村卫生领袖培养计划成功地运用了农村培养模式。