• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线反应对助听器增益自我调节的影响。

The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain.

作者信息

Keidser Gitte, Dillon Harvey, Convery Elizabeth

机构信息

National Acoustic Laboratories, 126 Greville Street, Chatswood, New South Wales 2067, Australia.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1668-81. doi: 10.1121/1.2951500.

DOI:10.1121/1.2951500
PMID:19045657
Abstract

Self-adjustments of variable hearing aid parameters are essential for trainable hearing aids to provide customized amplification for different listening environments. Prompted by a finding of Dreschler et al. [Ear Hear. 29, 214-227 (2008)], this study investigates the effect of the base line (starting) response on self-adjustments of gain in different frequency bands. In a laboratory test, 24 hearing-impaired listeners adjusted the bass, treble, and overall gain to reach their preferred responses from two different base line responses for 12 different listening situations. The adjustments were repeated five times using the preferred response after each adjustment as base line response for the next adjustment. Half of the listeners further compared three different response shapes, within the range of preferred responses, pairwise ten times for preferential and perceptual discrimination. The results revealed that base line response biases were more pronounced at low frequencies and for listeners with a flat hearing loss configuration. While 83% of listeners reliably discriminated between the average selected biased responses, only 25% demonstrated reliable preferences for one response over the other. Listeners who showed preferential discrimination ability were those who were less biased by the base line response. The clinical implication is that self-adjustments should begin from an appropriately prescribed starting response.

摘要

对于可训练的助听器而言,可变助听器参数的自我调整对于在不同聆听环境中提供定制放大功能至关重要。受德雷斯勒等人[《耳与听觉》29, 214 - 227 (2008)]研究结果的启发,本研究调查了基线(起始)响应对不同频段增益自我调整的影响。在一项实验室测试中,24名听力受损的听众针对12种不同的聆听情境,从两种不同的基线响应开始,调整低音、高音和总体增益,以达到他们偏好的响应。每次调整后,将偏好的响应作为下一次调整的基线响应,重复调整五次。一半的听众还在偏好响应范围内,对三种不同的响应形状进行两两比较,共进行十次,以进行偏好和感知辨别。结果显示,基线响应偏差在低频以及听力损失呈平坦型的听众中更为明显。虽然83%的听众能够可靠地区分平均选择的有偏差响应,但只有25%的听众表现出对一种响应相对于另一种响应的可靠偏好。表现出偏好辨别能力的听众是那些受基线响应偏差较小的人。临床意义在于,自我调整应从适当规定的起始响应开始。

相似文献

1
The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain.基线反应对助听器增益自我调节的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1668-81. doi: 10.1121/1.2951500.
2
Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.基于客户端的助听器增益调整:不同控制配置的效果。
Ear Hear. 2008 Apr;29(2):214-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816453a6.
3
The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.性能-感知测试(PPT)及其与助听器报告的听力障碍和助听器满意度的关系。
Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):229-42. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215976.64444.e6.
4
The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.一种具有可训练放大参数的助听器的设计与评估。
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):812-30. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181576738.
5
Environmental noise reduction configuration: Effects on preferences, satisfaction, and speech understanding.环境降噪配置:对偏好、满意度和言语理解的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2009 Dec;48(12):853-67. doi: 10.3109/14992020903131117.
6
Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?自适应频率响应(AFR)助听器能否减少掩蔽的“向上扩展”?
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(3):318-25.
7
Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.基于理想二元时频掩蔽的背景噪声下语音清晰度
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Apr;125(4):2336-47. doi: 10.1121/1.3083233.
8
Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1975 Sep-Oct;84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40.
9
Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids.
Int J Audiol. 2007 Oct;46(10):554-68. doi: 10.1080/14992020701481698.
10
Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.低增益插入时开放式助听器音乐的首选延迟和相位频率响应。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Dec;51(12):906-13. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.701020. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors in the Effective Use of Hearing Aids among Subjects with Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.老年听力损失患者有效使用助听器的相关因素:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 10;13(14):4027. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144027.
2
Feasibility of hearing aid gain self-adjustment using speech recognition.使用语音识别进行助听器增益自我调整的可行性
J Acoust Soc Korea. 2022;41(1):76-86. doi: 10.7776/ASK.2022.41.1.076. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.
助听器放大的自我调节:独立评估、配对比较和言语识别。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):305-321. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00164. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.模拟真实环境下助听器设置偏好的一致性:对可训练助听器的影响。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520933392. doi: 10.1177/2331216520933392.
5
Hearing Aid Self-Adjustment: Effects of Formal Speech-Perception Test and Noise.助听自调节:正式言语感知测试和噪声的影响。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520930545. doi: 10.1177/2331216520930545.
6
Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.验证一种非处方助听器的自适配方法。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216519900589. doi: 10.1177/2331216519900589.
7
Perceptual Effects of Adjusting Hearing-Aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference.基于个体用户偏好的机器学习方法调整助听器增益的感知效果。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519847413. doi: 10.1177/2331216519847413.
8
Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.自调节放大参数产生较大的个体间变异性并保持言语可懂度。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518798264. doi: 10.1177/2331216518798264.
9
A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index. Goldilocks 方法在助听器自验配中的应用:耳道输出和言语可懂度指数。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):107-115. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000617.
10
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid.自适配助听器的效果。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518768958. doi: 10.1177/2331216518768958.