The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
National Acoustic Laboratories, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520933392. doi: 10.1177/2331216520933392.
Trainable hearing aids let users fine-tune their hearing aid settings in their own listening environment: Based on consistent user-adjustments and information about the acoustic environment, the trainable aids will change environment-specific settings to the user's preference. A requirement for effective fine-tuning is consistency of preference for similar settings in similar environments. The aim of this study was to evaluate consistency of preference for settings differing in intensity, gain-frequency slope, and directionality when listening in simulated real-world environments and to determine if participants with more consistent preferences could be identified based on profile measures. A total of 52 adults (63-88 years) with hearing varying from normal to a moderate sensorineural hearing loss selected their preferred setting from pairs differing in intensity (3 or 6 dB), gain-frequency slope (±1.3 or ± 2.7 dB/octave), or directionality (omnidirectional vs. cardioid) in four simulated real-world environments: traffic noise, a monologue in traffic noise at 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio, and a dialogue in café noise at 5 and at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Forced-choice comparisons were made 10 times for each combination of pairs of settings and environment. Participants also completed nine psychoacoustic, cognitive, and personality measures. Consistency of preference, defined by a setting preferred at least 9 out of 10 times, varied across participants. More participants obtained consistent preferences for larger differences between settings and less difficult environments. The profile measures did not predict consistency of preference. Trainable aid users could benefit from counselling to ensure realistic expectations for particular adjustments and listening situations.
基于一致的用户调整和有关声学环境的信息,可训练的助听器将根据用户的偏好改变特定于环境的设置。有效微调的要求是对类似环境中的类似设置具有一致的偏好。本研究的目的是评估在模拟真实环境中聆听时,强度、增益频率斜率和方向性设置的差异的偏好一致性,并确定是否可以根据个人资料测量来识别具有更一致偏好的参与者。共有 52 名成年人(63-88 岁)具有从正常到中度感音神经性听力损失不等的听力,他们从四个模拟真实环境中强度(3 或 6 dB)、增益频率斜率(±1.3 或 ±2.7 dB/倍频程)或方向性(全向与心形)不同的设置对中选择了他们的首选设置:交通噪音、5 dB 信噪比的交通噪音中的独白,以及 5 和 0 dB 信噪比的咖啡馆噪音中的对话。对于每种环境和设置对组合,都进行了 10 次强制选择比较。参与者还完成了九项心理声学、认知和人格测量。偏好的一致性(定义为至少 10 次中有 9 次偏好的设置)因参与者而异。更多的参与者对设置之间的较大差异和较不困难的环境获得了更一致的偏好。个人资料测量并不能预测偏好的一致性。可训练的助听器用户可以从咨询中受益,以确保对特定调整和聆听情况的现实期望。