• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟真实环境下助听器设置偏好的一致性:对可训练助听器的影响。

Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.

机构信息

The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

National Acoustic Laboratories, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520933392. doi: 10.1177/2331216520933392.

DOI:10.1177/2331216520933392
PMID:32602407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7328351/
Abstract

Trainable hearing aids let users fine-tune their hearing aid settings in their own listening environment: Based on consistent user-adjustments and information about the acoustic environment, the trainable aids will change environment-specific settings to the user's preference. A requirement for effective fine-tuning is consistency of preference for similar settings in similar environments. The aim of this study was to evaluate consistency of preference for settings differing in intensity, gain-frequency slope, and directionality when listening in simulated real-world environments and to determine if participants with more consistent preferences could be identified based on profile measures. A total of 52 adults (63-88 years) with hearing varying from normal to a moderate sensorineural hearing loss selected their preferred setting from pairs differing in intensity (3 or 6 dB), gain-frequency slope (±1.3 or ± 2.7 dB/octave), or directionality (omnidirectional vs. cardioid) in four simulated real-world environments: traffic noise, a monologue in traffic noise at 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio, and a dialogue in café noise at 5 and at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Forced-choice comparisons were made 10 times for each combination of pairs of settings and environment. Participants also completed nine psychoacoustic, cognitive, and personality measures. Consistency of preference, defined by a setting preferred at least 9 out of 10 times, varied across participants. More participants obtained consistent preferences for larger differences between settings and less difficult environments. The profile measures did not predict consistency of preference. Trainable aid users could benefit from counselling to ensure realistic expectations for particular adjustments and listening situations.

摘要

可训练的助听器让用户可以在自己的聆听环境中微调助听器设置

基于一致的用户调整和有关声学环境的信息,可训练的助听器将根据用户的偏好改变特定于环境的设置。有效微调的要求是对类似环境中的类似设置具有一致的偏好。本研究的目的是评估在模拟真实环境中聆听时,强度、增益频率斜率和方向性设置的差异的偏好一致性,并确定是否可以根据个人资料测量来识别具有更一致偏好的参与者。共有 52 名成年人(63-88 岁)具有从正常到中度感音神经性听力损失不等的听力,他们从四个模拟真实环境中强度(3 或 6 dB)、增益频率斜率(±1.3 或 ±2.7 dB/倍频程)或方向性(全向与心形)不同的设置对中选择了他们的首选设置:交通噪音、5 dB 信噪比的交通噪音中的独白,以及 5 和 0 dB 信噪比的咖啡馆噪音中的对话。对于每种环境和设置对组合,都进行了 10 次强制选择比较。参与者还完成了九项心理声学、认知和人格测量。偏好的一致性(定义为至少 10 次中有 9 次偏好的设置)因参与者而异。更多的参与者对设置之间的较大差异和较不困难的环境获得了更一致的偏好。个人资料测量并不能预测偏好的一致性。可训练的助听器用户可以从咨询中受益,以确保对特定调整和聆听情况的现实期望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/17ef8b766495/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/25d7289d9fc3/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/44f17cd9fa8c/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/8ab1cd5f6d3c/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/17ef8b766495/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/25d7289d9fc3/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/44f17cd9fa8c/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/8ab1cd5f6d3c/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8318/7328351/17ef8b766495/10.1177_2331216520933392-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.模拟真实环境下助听器设置偏好的一致性:对可训练助听器的影响。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520933392. doi: 10.1177/2331216520933392.
2
Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.使用可训练的助听器来检测现实世界中的偏好增益。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;19(10):758-73. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.10.4.
3
An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.两种通用助听器处方方法(NAL-NL2和CAM2)对轻度至中度重度高频听力损失患者的初始适配比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Feb;24(2):138-50. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.7.
4
The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.一种具有可训练放大参数的助听器的设计与评估。
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):812-30. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181576738.
5
The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.高输入上限水平对噪声环境下单词识别、声音质量偏好及实际性能主观评分的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jun;26(6):547-62. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14051.
6
Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.基于智能手机的助听器设置学习与推理系统。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Oct;27(9):732-749. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15099.
7
Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?初次使用助听器的用户更喜欢正常音量还是低于正常的整体音量?
Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):159-72. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120364.13671.e2.
8
Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.对学龄期听力损失儿童的自适应噪声管理技术的评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 May;28(5):415-435. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16015.
9
Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.基于客户端的助听器增益调整:不同控制配置的效果。
Ear Hear. 2008 Apr;29(2):214-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816453a6.
10
Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.助听器中全向性与用户可选择的麦克风模式
Ear Hear. 2003 Oct;24(5):424-39. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000094555.89110.0A.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward an Extended Classification of Noise-Distortion Preferences by Modeling Longitudinal Dynamics of Listening Choices.通过对听力选择的纵向动态进行建模实现噪声-失真偏好的扩展分类
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251362018. doi: 10.1177/23312165251362018. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Effects of entropy in real-world noise on speech perception in listeners with normal hearing and hearing lossa).现实世界噪声中的熵效应对正常听力和听力损失者的言语感知的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Dec 1;154(6):3627-3643. doi: 10.1121/10.0022577.
3
Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises.语音噪声中增益增量的判别。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216518820220. doi: 10.1177/2331216518820220.
2
Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.成人助听器常见信号处理功能适配与微调的当前实践调查
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):118-124. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16107.
3
Hearing aid fine-tuning based on Dutch descriptions.基于荷兰语描述的助听器微调。
助听器放大的自我调节:独立评估、配对比较和言语识别。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):305-321. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00164. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Is the outcome of fitting hearing aids to adults affected by whether an audiogram-based prescription formula is individually applied? A systematic review protocol.成人助听器验配效果是否受基于听阈图的处方公式个体化应用的影响?系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e045899. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045899.
5
Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.探管法验证真耳助听听阈增益对成人助听效果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:2331216521999563. doi: 10.1177/2331216521999563.
Int J Audiol. 2017 Jul;56(7):507-515. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1288302. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
4
Provision, perception and use of trainable hearing aids in Australia: a survey of clinicians and hearing impaired adults.澳大利亚可训练助听器的供应、认知与使用:针对临床医生和听力受损成年人的一项调查
Int J Audiol. 2016 Dec;55(12):787-795. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1219776. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
5
Evaluation of Loudspeaker-Based Virtual Sound Environments for Testing Directional Hearing Aids.用于测试定向助听器的基于扬声器的虚拟声音环境评估
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):541-56. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15094.
6
A Dynamic Speech Comprehension Test for Assessing Real-World Listening Ability.一种用于评估现实世界听力能力的动态言语理解测试。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):515-26. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15089.
7
The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.言语噪声比中的最小有意义差异
Trends Hear. 2016 Feb 1;20:2331216515626570. doi: 10.1177/2331216515626570.
8
The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.NAL-NL2处方程序。
Audiol Res. 2011 Mar 23;1(1):e24. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2011.e24. eCollection 2011 May 10.
9
Objective analysis of ambisonics for hearing aid applications: Effect of listener's head, room reverberation, and directional microphones.用于助听器应用的双耳声强分析的客观研究:聆听者头部、房间混响及指向性麦克风的影响
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):3447-65. doi: 10.1121/1.4919330.
10
Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.现实声音场景中信噪比的估计
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):183-96. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.