Oxman Thomas E, Hegel Mark T, Hull Jay G, Dietrich Allen J
Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):933-43. doi: 10.1037/a0012617.
Research was undertaken to compare problem-solving treatment for primary care (PST-PC) with usual care for minor depression and to examine whether treatment effectiveness was moderated by coping style. PST-PC is a 6-session, manual-based, psychosocial skills intervention. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2 academic, primary care clinics. Those subjects who were eligible were randomized (N = 151), and 107 subjects completed treatment (57 PST-PC, 50 usual care) and a 35-week follow-up. Analysis with linear mixed modeling revealed significant effects of treatment and coping, such that those in PST-PC improved at a faster rate and those initially high in avoidant coping were significantly more likely to have sustained benefit from PST-PC.
开展了一项研究,以比较初级保健问题解决疗法(PST-PC)与轻度抑郁症常规护理的效果,并研究治疗效果是否会因应对方式而有所不同。PST-PC是一种为期6节、基于手册的心理社会技能干预措施。在2家学术性初级保健诊所进行了一项随机对照试验。符合条件的受试者被随机分组(N = 151),107名受试者完成了治疗(57人接受PST-PC,50人接受常规护理)以及35周的随访。线性混合模型分析显示了治疗和应对方式的显著影响,即接受PST-PC治疗的患者改善速度更快,而最初回避应对得分较高的患者从PST-PC中持续受益的可能性显著更高。