Suppr超能文献

管饲可改善短肠综合征患者的肠道吸收。

Tube feeding improves intestinal absorption in short bowel syndrome patients.

作者信息

Joly Francisca, Dray Xavier, Corcos Olivier, Barbot Laurence, Kapel Nathalie, Messing Bernard

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Nutrition Support, Center for Intestinal Failure, Adult Approved Home Parenteral Nutrition Center of Paris-Ile de France, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (PMAD), AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):824-31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.084. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tube feeding, recommended for patients with short bowel syndrome in only the postoperative period, has not been compared with oral feeding for absorption. We studied whether tube feeding increased absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome following the postoperative period.

METHODS

A randomized crossover study compared absorption between isocaloric tube feeding and oral feeding in 15 short bowel syndrome patients more than 3 months after short bowel constitution. An oral feeding period combined with enriched (1000 kcal * day(-1)) tube feeding was also tested. We measured the net intestinal absorption rates of proteins, lipids, and total calories using elemental nitrogen, Van de Kamer, and bomb calorimetry methods, respectively.

RESULTS

Tube feeding increased the mean (+/-SD) percent absorption (P < .001) of proteins (72% +/- 13% vs 57% +/- 18%), lipids (69% +/- 25% vs 41% +/- 27%), and energy (82% +/- 12% vs 65% +/- 16%) compared with oral feeding. In the group given the combined feedings (n = 9), the total enteral intake and net percent absorption increased (P < .001) for proteins (67% +/- 10%), lipids (59% +/- 19%), and total energy (75% +/- 8%) compared with oral feeding. Absorption (kcal * day(-1)) was greater (P < .001) with tube (2225 +/- 457) and combined feedings (2323 +/- 491) than with oral feeding (1638 +/- 458).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with short bowel syndrome, continuous tube feeding (exclusively or in conjunction with oral feeding) following the postoperative period significantly increased net absorption of lipids, proteins, and energy compared with oral feeding.

摘要

背景与目的

管饲仅在术后阶段推荐用于短肠综合征患者,尚未与口服喂养在吸收方面进行比较。我们研究了术后阶段后管饲是否能增加短肠综合征患者的吸收。

方法

一项随机交叉研究比较了15例短肠综合征患者在短肠形成3个月以上后等热量管饲与口服喂养的吸收情况。还测试了一个口服喂养期联合强化(1000千卡·天⁻¹)管饲的情况。我们分别使用元素氮、范德卡默法和弹式量热法测量蛋白质、脂质和总热量的净肠道吸收率。

结果

与口服喂养相比,管饲使蛋白质(72%±13%对57%±18%)、脂质(69%±25%对41%±27%)和能量(82%±12%对65%±16%)的平均(±标准差)吸收百分比增加(P<.001)。在接受联合喂养的组(n = 9)中,与口服喂养相比,蛋白质(67%±10%)、脂质(59%±19%)和总能量(75%±8%)的总肠内摄入量和净吸收百分比增加(P<.001)。管饲(2225±457)和联合喂养(2323±491)的吸收量(千卡·天⁻¹)高于口服喂养(1638±458)(P<.001)。

结论

在短肠综合征患者中,术后阶段持续管饲(单独或与口服喂养联合)与口服喂养相比,显著增加了脂质、蛋白质和能量的净吸收。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验