Joly Francisca, Dray Xavier, Corcos Olivier, Barbot Laurence, Kapel Nathalie, Messing Bernard
Gastroenterology and Nutrition Support, Center for Intestinal Failure, Adult Approved Home Parenteral Nutrition Center of Paris-Ile de France, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (PMAD), AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):824-31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.084. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tube feeding, recommended for patients with short bowel syndrome in only the postoperative period, has not been compared with oral feeding for absorption. We studied whether tube feeding increased absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome following the postoperative period.
A randomized crossover study compared absorption between isocaloric tube feeding and oral feeding in 15 short bowel syndrome patients more than 3 months after short bowel constitution. An oral feeding period combined with enriched (1000 kcal * day(-1)) tube feeding was also tested. We measured the net intestinal absorption rates of proteins, lipids, and total calories using elemental nitrogen, Van de Kamer, and bomb calorimetry methods, respectively.
Tube feeding increased the mean (+/-SD) percent absorption (P < .001) of proteins (72% +/- 13% vs 57% +/- 18%), lipids (69% +/- 25% vs 41% +/- 27%), and energy (82% +/- 12% vs 65% +/- 16%) compared with oral feeding. In the group given the combined feedings (n = 9), the total enteral intake and net percent absorption increased (P < .001) for proteins (67% +/- 10%), lipids (59% +/- 19%), and total energy (75% +/- 8%) compared with oral feeding. Absorption (kcal * day(-1)) was greater (P < .001) with tube (2225 +/- 457) and combined feedings (2323 +/- 491) than with oral feeding (1638 +/- 458).
In patients with short bowel syndrome, continuous tube feeding (exclusively or in conjunction with oral feeding) following the postoperative period significantly increased net absorption of lipids, proteins, and energy compared with oral feeding.
管饲仅在术后阶段推荐用于短肠综合征患者,尚未与口服喂养在吸收方面进行比较。我们研究了术后阶段后管饲是否能增加短肠综合征患者的吸收。
一项随机交叉研究比较了15例短肠综合征患者在短肠形成3个月以上后等热量管饲与口服喂养的吸收情况。还测试了一个口服喂养期联合强化(1000千卡·天⁻¹)管饲的情况。我们分别使用元素氮、范德卡默法和弹式量热法测量蛋白质、脂质和总热量的净肠道吸收率。
与口服喂养相比,管饲使蛋白质(72%±13%对57%±18%)、脂质(69%±25%对41%±27%)和能量(82%±12%对65%±16%)的平均(±标准差)吸收百分比增加(P<.001)。在接受联合喂养的组(n = 9)中,与口服喂养相比,蛋白质(67%±10%)、脂质(59%±19%)和总能量(75%±8%)的总肠内摄入量和净吸收百分比增加(P<.001)。管饲(2225±457)和联合喂养(2323±491)的吸收量(千卡·天⁻¹)高于口服喂养(1638±458)(P<.001)。
在短肠综合征患者中,术后阶段持续管饲(单独或与口服喂养联合)与口服喂养相比,显著增加了脂质、蛋白质和能量的净吸收。