Walker J D, Cotner Sehoya H, Baepler Paul M, Decker Mark D
Digital Media Center, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Winter;7(4):361-7. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004.
A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the "traditional" section; lecture time in the "active" section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.
一门历史上招收超过500名学生的生物学导论课程讲座被分成两个较小的部分,每个部分约250名学生。“传统”部分采用传统的讲座形式;“活跃”部分的讲座时间大幅减少,转而采用各种以学生为中心的课堂活动。两个部分的学生都参加了不定期测验和多项选择题考试。评估包括比较学生的调查回复、标准化教学评估表上的分数、各部分的平均分和出勤率,以及学生在期末调查中的开放式评论。结果表明,在活跃的环境与传统环境中,学生的表现即使没有更好,也一样出色。然而,学生对教师期望的担忧表明,明智地平衡以学生为中心的活动和讲授式教学可能是最佳方法。