Costa Pablo B, Graves Barbara S, Whitehurst Michael, Jacobs Patrick L
Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jan;23(1):141-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818eb052.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different durations of static stretching on dynamic balance. Women (N = 28) were tested before and after 2 stretching interventions and a control condition on 3 separate days, at least 48 hours apart. The stretching sessions involved a cycle ergometer warm-up at 70 rpm and 70 W followed by passive stretching of the lower-body muscles. Each stretching position was held at a point of mild discomfort and repeated 3 times with 15 seconds between stretches. In the 2 stretching protocols, the positions were maintained for 15 or 45 seconds. The control condition involved the same cycle ergometer warm-up, with a 26-minute rest period between pre- and posttests. Balance was assessed using the Biodex Balance System. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used with the effects of study condition (control, 15 seconds, 45 seconds) and time (pre-, postscores). Post hoc paired t-tests were used when appropriate to determine possible statistical significance between pre- and posttest scores. Analyses indicated no significant main effects for either study condition or time. However, there was a significant condition x time interaction (p < 0.05). Post hoc analyses indicated that the 15-second condition produced a significant improvement in the balance scores (p < 0.01), with no significant effects with the control condition or the 45-second treatment. The results of this study reveal that a stretching protocol of 45-second hold durations does not adversely affect balance when using the current stabilometry testing procedure. Furthermore, a stretching intervention with 15-second hold durations may improve balance performance by decreasing postural instability. Strength and conditioning professionals concerned with reported performance limitations associated with static stretching should consider applying shorter-duration stretching protocols when aiming to improve balance performance.
本研究的目的是检验不同时长的静态拉伸对动态平衡的影响。28名女性在3个不同日期接受了2次拉伸干预和1次对照条件测试,每次测试间隔至少48小时。拉伸环节包括在70转/分钟和70瓦的功率下进行自行车测功仪热身,随后对下半身肌肉进行被动拉伸。每个拉伸姿势保持在轻度不适的程度,每次拉伸重复3次,每次间隔15秒。在2种拉伸方案中,姿势保持15秒或45秒。对照条件包括相同的自行车测功仪热身,前后测试之间有26分钟的休息时间。使用Biodex平衡系统评估平衡能力。采用双向重复测量方差分析来研究测试条件(对照、15秒、45秒)和时间(测试前、测试后得分)的影响。在适当情况下,使用事后配对t检验来确定测试前和测试后得分之间可能存在的统计学显著性。分析表明,测试条件和时间均无显著的主效应。然而,存在显著的条件×时间交互作用(p<0.05)。事后分析表明,15秒条件下平衡得分有显著改善(p<0.01),对照条件和45秒处理均无显著影响。本研究结果表明,在使用当前的稳定测力测试程序时,45秒保持时长的拉伸方案不会对平衡产生不利影响。此外,15秒保持时长的拉伸干预可能通过减少姿势不稳定性来提高平衡表现。关注与静态拉伸相关的报告性能限制的力量和体能训练专业人员在旨在提高平衡表现时,应考虑采用较短时长的拉伸方案。