Quinn Virginia P, Hollis Jack F, Smith K Sabina, Rigotti Nancy A, Solberg Leif I, Hu Weiming, Stevens Victor J
Research & Evaluation Department, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 So. Los Robles Ave, 2nd Fl., Pasadena, CA 91188, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0865-9. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable mortality in the US. The national clinical guideline recommends an intervention for tobacco use known as the 5-As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange). Little is known about the model's effectiveness outside the research setting.
To assess the effectiveness of tobacco treatments in HMOs.
Smokers identified from primary care visits in nine nonprofit health plans.
DESIGN/METHODS: Smokers were surveyed at baseline and at 12-month follow-up to assess smoking status and tobacco treatments offered by clinicians and used by smokers.
Analyses include the 80% of respondents who reported having had a visit in the previous year with their clinician when they were smoking (n = 2,325). Smokers were more often offered Advice (77%) than the more effective Assist treatments-classes/counseling (41%) and pharmacotherapy (33%). One third of smokers reported using pharmacotherapy, but only 16% used classes or counseling. At follow-up, 8.9% were abstinent for >30 days. Smokers who reported being offered pharmacotherapy were more likely to quit than those who did not (adjusted OR = 1.73, CI = 1.22-2.45). Compared with smokers who didn't use classes/counseling or pharmacotherapy, those who did use these services were more likely to quit (adjusted OR = 1.82, CI = 1.16-2.86 and OR = 2.23, CI = 1.56-3.20, respectively).
Smokers were more likely to report quitting if they were offered cessation medications or if they used either medications or counseling. Results are similar to findings from clinical trials and highlight the need for clinicians and health plans to provide more than just advice to quit.
吸烟仍是美国可预防死亡的首要原因。国家临床指南推荐一种针对烟草使用的干预措施,即“5A法”(询问、建议、评估、协助和安排)。对于该模式在研究环境之外的有效性知之甚少。
评估健康维护组织(HMO)中烟草治疗的有效性。
从9个非营利性健康计划的初级保健就诊中识别出的吸烟者。
设计/方法:在基线和12个月随访时对吸烟者进行调查,以评估吸烟状况以及临床医生提供的和吸烟者使用的烟草治疗方法。
分析纳入了80%报告上一年吸烟时曾与临床医生就诊的受访者(n = 2325)。吸烟者更多地得到了建议(77%),而非更有效的协助治疗——课程/咨询(41%)和药物治疗(33%)。三分之一的吸烟者报告使用了药物治疗,但只有16%使用了课程或咨询。在随访时,8.9%的人戒烟超过30天。报告得到药物治疗的吸烟者比未得到的更有可能戒烟(调整后的比值比 = 1.73,可信区间 = 1.22 - 2.45)。与未使用课程/咨询或药物治疗的吸烟者相比,使用这些服务的吸烟者更有可能戒烟(调整后的比值比分别为 =