Hinarejos Pedro, Corrales Mónica, Matamalas Antonia, Bisbe Elvira, Cáceres Enric
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital de Esperanza-IMAS, Barcelona, Spain.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Apr;17(4):356-60. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0683-y. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
The aim of this study was to compare blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and patients operated with conventional instrumentation with intra-medullar guides. A prospective randomized study of 87 patients undergoing a TKA assigned to conventional technique (n = 44) or computer-assisted surgery (n = 43) was conducted. All patients were operated by the same surgeon and in all cases a cemented arthroplasty and deep recovery drainage were used. Both groups were comparable in all variables except for duration of ischemia, which was 13.7 min higher in the computer-assisted group. Blood loss due to drainage was higher in the conventional technique group (613 vs. 447 ml), as was the number of patients in which blood from the blood recovery system was reinfused (53 vs. 23%). Those patients undergoing computer-assisted surgery experienced less bleeding than those operated with the conventional technique. However, hemoglobin drop and allogenic transfusion rate were not statistically different in both groups.
本研究旨在比较接受计算机辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者与使用髓内导向常规器械进行手术的患者的失血量和输血需求。对87例行TKA的患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,这些患者被分为常规技术组(n = 44)或计算机辅助手术组(n = 43)。所有患者均由同一位外科医生进行手术,所有病例均采用骨水泥型关节置换术和深部恢复引流。除缺血持续时间外,两组在所有变量上均具有可比性,计算机辅助组的缺血持续时间长13.7分钟。常规技术组因引流导致的失血量更高(613 vs. 447 ml),回输血液回收系统血液的患者数量也更高(53% vs. 23%)。接受计算机辅助手术的患者比接受常规技术手术的患者出血更少。然而,两组的血红蛋白下降和异体输血率在统计学上并无差异。