Kray Jutta, Kipp Kerstin H, Karbach Julia
Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Campus A1 3, D-66123 Saarbruecken, Germany.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jan;130(1):48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
The role of language in the development of selective inhibitory control was examined in four groups: Children aged 7-9 years, children aged 11-13 years, adults aged 20-27 years, and adults aged 62-76 years. We used a modified stop-signal task in which participants inhibited or executed responses based on a visual signal. Response execution and inhibition were assessed by measurement of reaction times (RTs) and error rates to a go signal and RTs to a stop signal. Four task variations were compared in which subjects named (1) the stimulus, (2) the intended action (go/stop), (3) something irrelevant, or (4) nothing. Results showed different developmental trends for response execution and inhibition across the lifespan. Moreover, response execution was faster and more accurate when subjects named the stimulus instead of the intended action. The increase in response accuracy when naming the stimulus was greatest for children. In contrast to expectations, naming the intended action did not influence response inhibition. Overall, these findings suggest that verbal labeling supports the initiation but not the inhibition of actions.
7至9岁的儿童、11至13岁的儿童、20至27岁的成年人以及62至76岁的成年人。研究采用了一种改良的停止信号任务,参与者根据视觉信号抑制或执行反应。通过测量对“开始”信号的反应时间(RTs)和错误率以及对“停止”信号的反应时间来评估反应执行和抑制情况。研究比较了四种任务变体,即受试者命名(1)刺激物、(2)预期动作(开始/停止)、(3)无关事物或(4)不命名任何事物。结果显示,在整个生命周期中,反应执行和抑制呈现出不同的发展趋势。此外,当受试者命名刺激物而非预期动作时,反应执行速度更快且更准确。对于儿童而言,命名刺激物时反应准确性的提高最为显著。与预期相反,命名预期动作并未影响反应抑制。总体而言,这些发现表明言语标签支持动作的启动,但不支持动作的抑制。