Johnstone Stuart J, Clarke Adam R
School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Apr 30;166(2-3):223-37. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.03.005. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
While a response inhibition problem is well-established in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder of the combined subtype (AD/HDcom), the predominantly inattentive subtype (AD/HDin) has not been investigated previously. This study examined control versus subtype differences in visually evoked response inhibition using task performance and event-related potential (ERP) measures. Children with AD/HDcom (n=15) and AD/HDin (n=15) and age-matched controls (n=15) performed a cued visual Go/Nogo task requiring either activation or inhibition (30%) of a button-press response to the S2 (Go or Nogo stimulus) following the S1 (warning stimulus), presented 1380 ms earlier. Task performance and ERP indices of Warning, Go and Nogo stimulus processing, as well as preparation during the S1-S2 interval, were examined for group differences. Behavioural results indicated a response inhibition deficit in children with AD/HDcom and AD/HDin, with additional response activation problems in AD/HDcom. Topographic ERP differences between controls and both clinical groups suggested atypical (a) preparation for S2 as indexed by the late CNV, (b) early sensory/attentional processing of both S1 and S2, and (c) response inhibition as indexed by N2 and P3. In addition to replicating previous AD/HDcom findings, these results indicate that children with AD/HDin differ from controls in response preparation and inhibition during a cued visual Go/Nogo task.
虽然在注意缺陷多动障碍合并型(AD/HDcom)儿童中,反应抑制问题已得到充分证实,但以往尚未对主要为注意力不集中型(AD/HDin)进行过研究。本研究使用任务表现和事件相关电位(ERP)测量方法,检验了视觉诱发反应抑制中的控制组与亚型差异。AD/HDcom儿童(n = 15)、AD/HDin儿童(n = 15)和年龄匹配的对照组儿童(n = 15)执行了一个线索化视觉“Go/NoGo”任务,该任务要求在早1380毫秒呈现的S1(警告刺激)之后,对S2(“Go”或“NoGo”刺激)的按键反应进行激活或抑制(30%)。研究考察了三组在警告、“Go”和“NoGo”刺激处理的任务表现和ERP指标,以及S1 - S2间隔期的准备情况方面的差异。行为学结果表明,AD/HDcom和AD/HDin儿童存在反应抑制缺陷,AD/HDcom儿童还存在额外的反应激活问题。对照组与两个临床组之间的ERP地形图差异表明,(a)晚期CNV所指示的对S2的准备不典型,(b)S1和S2的早期感觉/注意处理不典型,以及(c)N2和P3所指示的反应抑制不典型。除了重复先前AD/HDcom的研究结果外,这些结果还表明,在线索化视觉“Go/NoGo”任务中,AD/HDin儿童在反应准备和抑制方面与对照组存在差异。