Kremen William S, Jacobson Kristen C, Panizzon Matthew S, Xian Hong, Eaves Lindon J, Eisen Seth A, Tsuang Ming T, Lyons Michael J
Department of Psychiatry, Center for Behavioral Genomics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0738, USA.
Behav Genet. 2009 Mar;39(2):133-44. doi: 10.1007/s10519-008-9242-z. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
We examined the genetic architecture of a Tower of London test of planning and problem-solving in 690 middle-aged male twins. Phenotypic analyses revealed only one general factor, but the best-fitting genetic model indicated two correlated genetic factors: speed and efficiency. One variable-number of attempts required to mentally figure the puzzles-loaded on both factors. Shared environmental effects could be dropped with virtually no reduction in model fit. Despite significant nonshared environmental correlations across measures, there was no discernable nonshared environmental factor structure. The correlation between genetic factors (r = 0.46) and the variable loading on both factors could reflect modulation of planning, testing alternatives, and working memory that are required to perform the test. Such coordinated activity is consistent with the notion of a supervisory attentional system, a central executive, or metacognitive ability. The different phenotypic and genetic factor results suggest that relying solely on the former could obscure genetic associations.
我们对690名中年男性双胞胎进行了伦敦塔计划与解决问题测试的遗传结构研究。表型分析仅揭示了一个一般因素,但最佳拟合遗传模型表明存在两个相关的遗传因素:速度和效率。一个变量——即心理计算谜题所需的尝试次数——在两个因素上均有载荷。共享环境效应可以去除,而模型拟合几乎没有降低。尽管各测量指标之间存在显著的非共享环境相关性,但没有可辨别的非共享环境因素结构。遗传因素之间的相关性(r = 0.46)以及该变量在两个因素上的载荷可能反映了执行该测试所需的计划、测试备选方案和工作记忆的调节。这种协调活动与监督注意系统、中央执行系统或元认知能力的概念相一致。不同的表型和遗传因素结果表明,仅依赖前者可能会掩盖遗传关联。