• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[目标群体、项目与赞助商之间合作的参与情况]

[Participation in the cooperation between target group, project and sponsor].

作者信息

Wright M T, Block M, von Unger H

机构信息

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):748-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102955. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-0028-1102955
PMID:19085671
Abstract

The intrinsic connection between empowerment and participation is apparent in the Ottawa Charter on Health Promotion. In order for citizens to reach a higher degree of autonomy and control over health-related factors (empowerment) they need to have an active role in the decision-making processes affecting their lives and the environment in which they live (participation). This implies that many decisions are made affecting the health of citizens over which they have no influence. The question is: Who has the power to make such decisions and how can this power be shared more equitably? This question can be raised not only at the highest political level, but also locally in the context of the collaboration between various stake-holders. The local level plays a key role in deciding which health promotion measures are developed and funded, thus contributing in an important way to strengthening communities. In this article the method "Circles of Decision-Making" is presented as a tool for assisting those working at the local level in determining to what degree the active participation of the various stake-holders has been achieved and in what ways the participation of those "on the outside" of decision-making processes can be strengthened. This method is based on the concept of Participatory Quality Development (PQD) created by the authors and their community partners. PQD uses methods from community-based research to address issues of quality in community-level health promotion and prevention.

摘要

赋权与参与之间的内在联系在《渥太华促进健康宪章》中显而易见。为了让公民在与健康相关的因素方面实现更高程度的自主和掌控(赋权),他们需要在影响其生活及生活环境的决策过程中发挥积极作用(参与)。这意味着做出了许多影响公民健康但他们却无法施加影响的决策。问题在于:谁有权做出此类决策,以及如何能更公平地分享这种权力?这个问题不仅可以在最高政治层面提出,在地方层面,在各类利益相关者之间的合作背景下也可以提出。地方层面在决定制定和资助哪些健康促进措施方面发挥着关键作用,从而以重要方式为加强社区做出贡献。在本文中,“决策圈”方法作为一种工具被呈现出来,用于协助地方层面的工作人员确定各类利益相关者的积极参与在何种程度上得以实现,以及如何加强决策过程“外部”人员的参与。该方法基于作者及其社区伙伴创建的参与式质量发展(PQD)概念。PQD运用基于社区的研究方法来解决社区层面健康促进和预防中的质量问题。

相似文献

1
[Participation in the cooperation between target group, project and sponsor].[目标群体、项目与赞助商之间合作的参与情况]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):748-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102955. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
2
[Empowerment in prevention and health promotion--a critical conceptual evaluation of basic understanding, dimensions and assessment problems].[预防与健康促进中的赋权——对基本理解、维度及评估问题的批判性概念评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):715-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102956. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
3
[Empowerment of women in difficult life situations: the BIG project].[处于艰难生活境遇中的妇女赋权:重大项目]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):742-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103262. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
4
[Empowerment for the elderly].老年人赋权
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):730-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103270. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
5
[Empowerment and health promotion programming].[赋权与健康促进规划]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):736-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103259. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
6
[The empowerment concept: fuzzy, uncomfortable, uncertain--and indispensable].[赋权概念:模糊、令人不适、不确定——但不可或缺]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):713-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102958. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
7
[Evaluation of empowerment: health promotion practitioners' perceptions and concepts. Results of a qualitative study in Australia].[赋权评估:健康促进从业者的认知与概念。澳大利亚一项定性研究的结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):755-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103260. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
8
[Measuring, evaluating and strategic development of community capacity and empowerment: introduction of a qualitative tool].[社区能力与赋权的测量、评估及战略发展:一种定性工具的介绍]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):764-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102959. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
[Empowerment of children and adolescents--the role of personal and social resources and personal autonomy for subjective health].[儿童和青少年的赋权——个人和社会资源以及个人自主性对主观健康的作用]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):721-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103261. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
10
[Empowerment--learning from gandhi?].[赋权——向甘地学习?]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):791-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103271. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and Facilitation Approaches for the Participatory Design of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Protocol for a Scoping Review.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统参与式设计的挑战和促进方法:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 5;13:e58185. doi: 10.2196/58185.
2
Small-scale urban design interventions: A framework for deploying cities as resource for mental health and mental health literacy.小规模城市设计干预措施:将城市作为促进心理健康及心理健康素养资源的部署框架。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 20;14:1112209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112209. eCollection 2023.
3
Participatory Approaches in Family Health Promotion as an Opportunity for Health Behavior Change-A Rapid Review.
参与式方法在家庭健康促进中作为健康行为改变的机会——快速综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;19(14):8680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148680.
4
[Public Health and Participation of Experts from Experience in Austria: a First Exploratory Survey].[奥地利专家基于经验的公共卫生与参与:首次探索性调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Jun;85(6):554-560. doi: 10.1055/a-1829-6899. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Development, implementation, evaluation and scaling-up of physical activity referral schemes in Germany: protocol for a study using a co-production approach.德国身体活动转介计划的制定、实施、评估和推广:使用共同生产方法的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e045563. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045563.