Thomson A J, Nimmo A F, Tiplady B, Glen J B
Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Ral Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jan;64(1):32-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05683.x.
The utility of two-choice visual reaction time testing using a specially programmed mobile telephone as a measure of sedation level was investigated in 20 healthy patients sedated with target controlled infusions of propofol. At gradually increasing target concentrations visual reaction time was compared with patient-assessed visual analogue scale sedation scores and an observer-rated scale. Propofol sedation caused dose-dependent increases in visual reaction time and visual analogue scale scores that were statistically significant when the calculated effect-site concentration reached 0.9 microg.ml(-1) (p < 0.05) and 0.5 microg.ml(-1) (p < 0.01) respectively. While visual analogue scale scores were more sensitive at lower levels of sedation than visual reaction time, the latter demonstrated marked increase in values at higher levels of sedation. Visual reaction time may be useful for identifying impending over-sedation.
在20名接受丙泊酚靶控输注镇静的健康患者中,研究了使用专门编程的移动电话进行二选一视觉反应时间测试作为镇静水平衡量指标的效用。在逐渐增加的靶浓度下,将视觉反应时间与患者自评的视觉模拟量表镇静评分以及观察者评定量表进行比较。丙泊酚镇静导致视觉反应时间和视觉模拟量表评分呈剂量依赖性增加,当计算的效应室浓度分别达到0.9μg.ml(-1)(p<0.05)和0.5μg.ml(-1)(p<0.01)时,具有统计学意义。虽然视觉模拟量表评分在较低镇静水平时比视觉反应时间更敏感,但后者在较高镇静水平时显示出明显的数值增加。视觉反应时间可能有助于识别即将出现的过度镇静。