Takase Bonpei, Matsushima Yoshihiro, Uehata Akimi, Ishihara Masayuki, Kurita Akira
National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Division of Biomedical Engineering, Saitama, Japan.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008 Dec 16;6:61. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-61.
While both flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery (BA), which measures endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, and intima-media thickness (IMT) in the carotid artery are correlated with the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not clear which modality is a better predictor of CAD. Furthermore, it has not been fully determined whether either of these modalities is superior to conventional ST-segment depression on exercise stress electrocardiogram (ECG) as a predictor. Thus, the goal of the present study was to compare the predictive value of FMD, IMT, and stress ECG for CAD prognosis.
A total of 103 consecutive patients (62 +/- 9 years old, 79 men) with clinically suspected CAD had FMD and nitroglycerin-induced dilation (NTG-D) in the BA, carotid artery IMT measurement using high-resolution ultrasound, and exercise treadmill testing. The 73 CAD patients and 30 normal coronary patients were followed for 50 +/- 15 months. Fifteen patients had coronary events during this period (1 cardiac death, 2 non-fatal myocardial infarctions, 3 acute heart failures, and 9 unstable anginas). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, only FMD and stress ECG were significant predictors for cardiac events.
Brachial endothelial function as reflected by FMD and conventional exercise stress testing has comparable prognostic value, whereas carotid artery plaque burden appears to be less powerful for predicting future cardiac events.
肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张功能(FMD)用于测量内皮依赖性血管舒张,颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)均与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的预后相关,但尚不清楚哪种方式能更好地预测CAD。此外,尚未完全确定这两种方式中的任何一种作为预测指标是否优于运动应激心电图(ECG)上的传统ST段压低。因此,本研究的目的是比较FMD、IMT和应激心电图对CAD预后的预测价值。
共有103例临床疑似CAD的连续患者(62±9岁,79例男性)接受了肱动脉FMD和硝酸甘油诱导的血管舒张(NTG-D)、使用高分辨率超声测量颈动脉IMT以及运动平板试验。73例CAD患者和30例冠状动脉正常患者随访了50±15个月。在此期间,15例患者发生了冠状动脉事件(1例心源性死亡、2例非致命性心肌梗死、3例急性心力衰竭和9例不稳定型心绞痛)。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,只有FMD和应激心电图是心脏事件的显著预测指标。
FMD反映的肱动脉内皮功能和传统运动应激试验具有相当的预后价值,而颈动脉斑块负荷对预测未来心脏事件的作用似乎较小。