Conradi Henk Jan, de Jonge Peter
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jul;116(1-2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.027. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
Recurrent depression is associated with interpersonal dysfunctioning which is related to underlying insecure attachment. In this study we examined associations between adult attachment and the long-term course of depression in depressed primary care patients.
Depressed primary care patients were 3-monthly assessed during a prospective 3-year follow-up regarding: (1) severity of depression (BDI); and proportions of: (2) depression-free time; (3) depressive symptom-free time; and (4) time on antidepressants (all CIDI interview). Attachment style was assessed by the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire at two points in time: (1) one year before the end of follow-up (1-year prospectively followed subsample; n=68); and (2) at the end of the 3-year follow-up (3-year retrospective subsample; n=145). Mixed model analyses and non-parametric tests were used to determine whether different attachment styles were associated with different courses of depression.
Fearfully attached patients in the prospective sample reported a statistically significant worse depression course compared with securely attached patients (adjusted mean BDI 12.7 v. 6.8 respectively; F=3.22; p=0.029), which was confirmed in the retrospective sample (adjusted mean BDI 15.7 v. 8.8; F=7.86; p<0.001). They reported significantly more prior depressive episodes and residual symptoms, longer use of antidepressants, and worse social functioning as well.
Size of the prospective sample was restricted.
Fearfully attached subjects constitute a particularly vulnerable category of depressed patients. Information on their attachment style may provide GPs with indications regarding intensity, goals and approach of treatment.
复发性抑郁症与人际功能障碍有关,而人际功能障碍又与潜在的不安全依恋相关。在本研究中,我们调查了成年依恋与初级保健抑郁症患者抑郁症的长期病程之间的关联。
在一项为期3年的前瞻性随访中,对初级保健抑郁症患者每3个月进行一次评估,内容包括:(1)抑郁严重程度(贝克抑郁量表);以及以下各项的比例:(2)无抑郁时间;(3)无抑郁症状时间;(4)服用抗抑郁药的时间(均通过复合性国际诊断交谈检查表访谈)。依恋风格通过亲密关系经历问卷在两个时间点进行评估:(1)随访结束前一年(前瞻性随访1年的子样本;n = 68);(2)3年随访结束时(回顾性3年的子样本;n = 145)。采用混合模型分析和非参数检验来确定不同的依恋风格是否与不同的抑郁病程相关。
在前瞻性样本中,恐惧型依恋的患者与安全型依恋的患者相比,报告的抑郁病程在统计学上显著更差(调整后的平均贝克抑郁量表得分分别为12.7和6.8;F = 3.22;p = 0.029),这在回顾性样本中得到了证实(调整后的平均贝克抑郁量表得分分别为15.7和8.8;F = 7.86;p < 0.001)。他们报告有更多既往抑郁发作和残留症状,服用抗抑郁药的时间更长,社交功能也更差。
前瞻性样本的规模有限。
恐惧型依恋的受试者是抑郁症患者中特别脆弱的一类。关于他们依恋风格的信息可能为全科医生提供有关治疗强度、目标和方法的指示。