Niparko J K, Oviatt D L, Coker N J, Sutton L, Waltzman S B, Cohen N L
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0312.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Jun;104(6):826-30. doi: 10.1177/019459989110400610.
The course of the facial nerve may place it within the current field generated by an activated cochlear implant to produce incidental facial movement. We investigated the presence of facial nerve stimulation associated with cochlear implants in the VA Cooperative Study of Advanced Cochlear implants. Twelve of 82 patients enrolled in this study demonstrated facial nerve stimulation within 2 years of implant activation. Facial nerve stimulation in six patients with multiple channel implants (Nucleus or ineraid devices) either resolved spontaneously (n = 2), or was eliminated by deactivating basal (n = 2) or apical (n = 2) electrodes. Two of six patients with single-channel electrodes (3-M/Vienna devices) demonstrated facial nerve stimulation that resolved spontaneously (n = 2), resolved with lowering current output (n = 2), or was refractory to processor adjustment (n = 2). Intraoperative assessment in one of the refractory cases indicated that facial nerve stimulation resulted from current spread through the modiolus to activate the facial nerve. A variety of factors, including implant design, stimulus parameters, and local tissue impedances, may interact to produce incidental facial stimulation. Low-impedance pathways between the scala tympani and the modiolus may deserve increased recognition as an interactive factor in cochlear implant performance.
面神经的走行可能使其处于激活的人工耳蜗所产生的当前电场范围内,从而引发偶然的面部运动。我们在退伍军人事务部高级人工耳蜗合作研究中,对与人工耳蜗相关的面神经刺激情况进行了调查。在该研究纳入的82例患者中,有12例在植入物激活后的2年内出现了面神经刺激。6例使用多通道植入物(Nucleus或Ineraid装置)的患者出现的面神经刺激,要么自行缓解(2例),要么通过停用基底电极(2例)或顶端电极(2例)而消除。6例使用单通道电极(3-M/维也纳装置)的患者中有2例出现的面神经刺激,自行缓解(2例),通过降低电流输出缓解(2例),或对处理器调整无效(2例)。其中1例无效病例的术中评估表明,面神经刺激是由电流通过蜗轴扩散以激活面神经所致。包括植入物设计、刺激参数和局部组织阻抗在内的多种因素可能相互作用,从而产生偶然的面部刺激。鼓阶与蜗轴之间的低阻抗通路作为人工耳蜗性能中的一个相互作用因素,可能值得更多关注。