Morgan Angela, Jones Diana
Centre for Learning and Quality Enhancement, University of Teesside, UK.
Med Teach. 2009 Feb;31(2):82-95. doi: 10.1080/01421590802526946.
The involvement of service users in healthcare education has followed an increasing focus on patient-centred services. CETL4HealthNE, regional healthcare education collaboration, undertook a literature review to inform involvement strategies.
To identify--approaches used to involve service users in healthcare education curricula; perceptions of key stakeholders; impact of involvement on students' knowledge and skills, and the quality of care delivered.
A structured search of the literature on service user involvement in Higher Education healthcare curricular activity was undertaken (July 2006-February 2007). Papers were screened and data extracted and synthesized according to the aspect of the curriculum enhanced by involvement and level of impact evaluation.
Thirty papers addressed interventions in pre- and 11 in post-registration education. Thirty studies reported on evaluation. Students and service users both benefited from service user involvement in health care programmes. There was limited evidence that involvement changed behaviour in practice or significantly benefited the recipient of care.
Service user involvement in curricular developments for healthcare professionals is a policy imperative aimed at improving their experience of services. Despite a limited and weak traditional evidence base for impact on students' knowledge and practice, both students and service users identify benefits from engagement. Further development of evaluation methodologies is required.
随着对以患者为中心的服务的日益关注,服务使用者参与医疗保健教育的情况也越来越多。区域医疗保健教育合作组织CETL4HealthNE进行了一项文献综述,以为参与策略提供参考。
确定——用于让服务使用者参与医疗保健教育课程的方法;关键利益相关者的看法;参与对学生知识和技能的影响,以及所提供护理的质量。
对2006年7月至2007年2月期间关于服务使用者参与高等教育医疗保健课程活动的文献进行了结构化检索。根据参与增强的课程方面和影响评估水平对论文进行筛选、数据提取和综合分析。
30篇论文涉及注册前教育的干预措施,11篇涉及注册后教育。30项研究报告了评估情况。学生和服务使用者都从服务使用者参与医疗保健项目中受益。仅有有限的证据表明参与改变了实践中的行为或使护理接受者显著受益。
服务使用者参与医疗保健专业人员的课程开发是一项旨在改善其服务体验的政策要求。尽管关于对学生知识和实践的影响的传统证据基础有限且薄弱,但学生和服务使用者都认为参与有好处。需要进一步开发评估方法。