• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经过八年顺势疗法治疗后,慢性病患者的健康状况如何?——一项长期观察性研究的结果。

How healthy are chronically ill patients after eight years of homeopathic treatment?--Results from a long term observational study.

作者信息

Witt Claudia M, Lüdtke Rainer, Mengler Nils, Willich Stefan N

机构信息

Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, D-10098 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 17;8:413. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-413.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-8-413
PMID:19091085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2630323/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Homeopathy is a highly debated but often used medical treatment. With this cohort study we aimed to evaluate health status changes under homeopathic treatment in routine care. Here we extend former results, now presenting data of an 8-year follow-up.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicentre cohort study with 103 homeopathic primary care practices in Germany and Switzerland, data from all patients (age >1 year) consulting the physician for the first time were observed. The main outcome measures were: The patients' perceived change in complaint severity (numeric rating scales from 0 = no complaint to 10 = maximal severity) and quality of life as measured by the SF-36 at baseline, and after 2 and 8 years.

RESULTS

A total of 3,709 patients were studied, 73% (2,722 adults, 72.8% female, age at baseline 41.0 +/- 12.3; 819 children, 48.4% female, age 6.5 +/- 4.0) contributed data to the 8-year follow-up. The most frequent diagnoses were allergic rhinitis and headache in adults, and atopic dermatitis and multiple recurrent infections in children. Disease severity decreased significantly (p < 0.001) between baseline, 2 and 8 years (adults from 6.2 +/- 1.7 to 2.9 +/- 2.2 and 2.7 +/- 2.1; children from 6.1 +/- 1.8 to 2.1 +/- 2.0 and 1.7 +/- 1.9). Physical and mental quality of life sores also increased considerably. Younger age, female gender and more severe disease at baseline were factors predictive of better therapeutic success.

CONCLUSION

Patients who seek homeopathic treatment are likely to improve considerably. These effects persist for as long as 8 years.

摘要

背景

顺势疗法是一种备受争议但常用的医学疗法。通过这项队列研究,我们旨在评估常规护理中顺势疗法治疗下的健康状况变化。在此,我们扩展了先前的结果,现呈现8年随访的数据。

方法

在一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究中,观察了德国和瑞士103家顺势疗法初级保健机构中所有首次咨询医生的患者(年龄>1岁)的数据。主要结局指标为:患者自我感知的症状严重程度变化(数字评分量表,从0 = 无症状到10 = 最严重症状)以及基线时、2年和8年后通过SF - 36测量的生活质量。

结果

共研究了3709例患者,73%(2722例成年人,72.8%为女性,基线年龄41.0±12.3岁;819例儿童,48.4%为女性,年龄6.5±4.0岁)的患者为8年随访提供了数据。成年人中最常见的诊断为过敏性鼻炎和头痛,儿童中为特应性皮炎和多次反复感染。疾病严重程度在基线、2年和8年之间显著降低(p < 0.001)(成年人从6.2±1.7降至2.9±2.2和2.7±2.1;儿童从6.1±1.8降至2.1±2.0和1.7±1.9)。身体和精神生活质量评分也有显著提高。年龄较小、女性以及基线时疾病更严重是治疗效果更好的预测因素。

结论

寻求顺势疗法治疗的患者可能会有显著改善。这些效果可持续长达8年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c9/2630323/6bfd41b5a2f2/1471-2458-8-413-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c9/2630323/6bfd41b5a2f2/1471-2458-8-413-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c9/2630323/6bfd41b5a2f2/1471-2458-8-413-1.jpg

相似文献

1
How healthy are chronically ill patients after eight years of homeopathic treatment?--Results from a long term observational study.经过八年顺势疗法治疗后,慢性病患者的健康状况如何?——一项长期观察性研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Dec 17;8:413. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-413.
2
Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients.顺势疗法医疗实践:一项针对3981名患者的队列研究的长期结果
BMC Public Health. 2005 Nov 3;5:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-115.
3
Homeopathic treatment of elderly patients--a prospective observational study with follow-up over a two year period.顺势疗法治疗老年患者-一项前瞻性观察研究,随访时间超过两年。
BMC Geriatr. 2010 Feb 22;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-10.
4
Pediatric homeopathy: a prospective observational survey based on parent proxy-reports of their children's health-related Quality of Life in six European countries and Brazil.儿童顺势疗法:一项基于六个欧洲国家和巴西父母对其子女健康相关生活质量的代理报告的前瞻性观察性调查。
Homeopathy. 2014 Oct;103(4):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
5
Towards standard setting for patient-reported outcomes in the NHS homeopathic hospitals.迈向英国国民医疗服务体系顺势疗法医院患者报告结局的标准制定。
Homeopathy. 2008 Jul;97(3):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2008.06.005.
6
Diagnoses and treatment in homeopathic medical practice.顺势疗法医疗实践中的诊断与治疗。
Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2004 Apr;11(2):98-103. doi: 10.1159/000078231.
7
Anthroposophic medical therapy in chronic disease: a four-year prospective cohort study.慢性病中的人智学医学疗法:一项为期四年的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Apr 23;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-7-10.
8
Homeopathy and health related Quality of Life: a patient satisfaction survey in six European countries and Brazil.顺势疗法与健康相关生活质量:一项在六个欧洲国家和巴西开展的患者满意度调查
Homeopathy. 2014 Oct;103(4):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
Investigating the sociodemographic profile and health-related outcomes of chronically ill homeopathic patients: results from an observational multi-centered study in Bulgaria.调查慢性病顺势疗法患者的社会人口学特征和与健康相关的结局:来自保加利亚一项观察性多中心研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):1648. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7914-7.
10
Patient satisfaction and side effects in primary care: an observational study comparing homeopathy and conventional medicine.初级保健中的患者满意度与副作用:一项比较顺势疗法和传统医学的观察性研究。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008 Sep 18;8:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Homeopathy is not placebo effect: proof of the scientific evidence for homeopathy in open access trilingual e-book.顺势疗法不是安慰剂效应:在开放获取的三语电子书证明顺势疗法的科学证据。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Aug 3;79:100456. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100456. eCollection 2024.
2
"Homeopathy is not placebo effect": proof of the scientific evidence for homeopathy.“顺势疗法并非安慰剂效应”:顺势疗法的科学证据证明
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 May 3;70(4):e20231438. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231438. eCollection 2024.
3
Investigating the sociodemographic profile and health-related outcomes of chronically ill homeopathic patients: results from an observational multi-centered study in Bulgaria.

本文引用的文献

1
Homeopathic treatment for chronic disease: a 6-year, university-hospital outpatient observational study.慢性病的顺势疗法治疗:一项为期6年的大学医院门诊观察性研究。
J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):793-8. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.793.
2
Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients.顺势疗法医疗实践:一项针对3981名患者的队列研究的长期结果
BMC Public Health. 2005 Nov 3;5:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-115.
3
Audit of outcome in 455 consecutive patients treated with homeopathic medicines.
调查慢性病顺势疗法患者的社会人口学特征和与健康相关的结局:来自保加利亚一项观察性多中心研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):1648. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7914-7.
4
Effect of Homeopathy on Pain Intensity and Quality Of Life of Students With Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.顺势疗法对原发性痛经学生疼痛强度及生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Aug 9;18(9):e30902. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.30902. eCollection 2016 Sep.
5
Homeopathy Use by US Adults: Results of a National Survey.美国成年人使用顺势疗法:一项全国性调查的结果。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):743-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303025. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Is There a Role for Homeopathy in Cancer Care? Questions and Challenges.顺势疗法在癌症治疗中能发挥作用吗?问题与挑战。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2015 Sep;17(9):43. doi: 10.1007/s11912-015-0467-8.
7
Homeopathic medications as clinical alternatives for symptomatic care of acute otitis media and upper respiratory infections in children.顺势疗法药物作为儿童急性中耳炎和上呼吸道感染症状性护理的临床替代方案。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 Jan;2(1):32-43. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.2.1.007.
8
Homeopathy for depression: a randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-armed study (DEP-HOM).抑郁症顺势疗法:一项随机、部分双盲、安慰剂对照、四臂研究(DEP-HOM)。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 23;8(9):e74537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074537. eCollection 2013.
9
Plausibility and evidence: the case of homeopathy.合理性与证据:顺势疗法的案例
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Aug;16(3):525-32. doi: 10.1007/s11019-012-9413-9.
10
Traditional Japanese Kampo Medicine: Clinical Research between Modernity and Traditional Medicine-The State of Research and Methodological Suggestions for the Future.传统日本汉方医学:现代与传统医学之间的临床研究——研究现状与未来方法论建议。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:513842. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neq067. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
Homeopathy. 2005 Oct;94(4):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2005.07.002.
4
A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital.一项关于前往格拉斯哥顺势疗法医院的患者在12个月内的咨询与关系同理心、患者赋能及健康变化的前瞻性试点研究。
J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):591-600. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.591.
5
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy.顺势疗法的临床效果是安慰剂效应吗?顺势疗法与对抗疗法的安慰剂对照试验比较研究。
Lancet. 2005;366(9487):726-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2.
6
Patients' assessments of the effectiveness of homeopathic care in Norway: a prospective observational multicentre outcome study.挪威患者对顺势疗法护理效果的评估:一项前瞻性观察性多中心结局研究。
Homeopathy. 2005 Jan;94(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.11.016.
7
[Use and acceptance of classical natural and alternative medicine in Germany--findings of a representative population-based survey].[德国对传统天然药物和替代医学的使用与接受情况——一项基于代表性人群调查的结果]
Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2004 Dec;11(6):327-34. doi: 10.1159/000082814.
8
Use of complementary or alternative medicine in a general population in Great Britain. Results from the National Omnibus survey.英国普通人群中补充和替代医学的使用情况。全国综合调查结果。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Jun;26(2):152-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh139.
9
Measuring the effects of acupuncture and homoeopathy in general practice: an uncontrolled prospective documentation approach.在全科医疗中测量针灸和顺势疗法的效果:一种非对照前瞻性记录方法。
BMC Public Health. 2004 Mar 4;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-6.
10
An observational study of patients receiving homeopathic treatment.一项针对接受顺势疗法治疗患者的观察性研究。
Homeopathy. 2004 Jan;93(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2003.11.010.