Gupta Akanksha, Gerlitz Bruce, Richardson Mark A, Bull Christopher, Berg David T, Syed Samreen, Galbreath Elizabeth J, Swanson Barbara A, Jones Bryan E, Grinnell Brian W
Biotechnology Discovery Research, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285-0444, USA.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Feb;20(2):267-77. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030294. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
Administration of activated protein C (APC) protects from renal dysfunction, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. APC exerts both antithrombotic and cytoprotective properties, the latter via modulation of protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) signaling. We generated APC variants to study the relative importance of the two functions of APC in a model of LPS-induced renal microvascular dysfunction. Compared with wild-type APC, the K193E variant exhibited impaired anticoagulant activity but retained the ability to mediate PAR-1-dependent signaling. In contrast, the L8W variant retained anticoagulant activity but lost its ability to modulate PAR-1. By administering wild-type APC or these mutants in a rat model of LPS-induced injury, we found that the PAR-1 agonism, but not the anticoagulant function of APC, reversed LPS-induced systemic hypotension. In contrast, both functions of APC played a role in reversing LPS-induced decreases in renal blood flow and volume, although the effects on PAR-1-dependent signaling were more potent. Regarding potential mechanisms for these findings, APC-mediated PAR-1 agonism suppressed LPS-induced increases in the vasoactive peptide adrenomedullin and infiltration of iNOS-positive leukocytes into renal tissue. However, the anticoagulant function of APC was responsible for suppressing LPS-induced stimulation of the proinflammatory mediators ACE-1, IL-6, and IL-18, perhaps accounting for its ability to modulate renal hemodynamics. Both variants reduced active caspase-3 and abrogated LPS-induced renal dysfunction and pathology. We conclude that although PAR-1 agonism is solely responsible for APC-mediated improvement in systemic hemodynamics, both functions of APC play distinct roles in attenuating the response to injury in the kidney.
给予活化蛋白C(APC)可预防肾功能不全,但其潜在机制尚不清楚。APC具有抗血栓形成和细胞保护特性,后者是通过调节蛋白酶激活受体-1(PAR-1)信号传导来实现的。我们生成了APC变体,以研究APC的这两种功能在脂多糖(LPS)诱导的肾微血管功能障碍模型中的相对重要性。与野生型APC相比,K193E变体的抗凝活性受损,但保留了介导PAR-1依赖性信号传导的能力。相反,L8W变体保留了抗凝活性,但失去了调节PAR-1的能力。通过在LPS诱导的损伤大鼠模型中给予野生型APC或这些突变体,我们发现APC的PAR-1激动作用而非抗凝功能可逆转LPS诱导的全身性低血压。相比之下,APC的两种功能在逆转LPS诱导的肾血流量和血容量减少方面均发挥了作用,尽管对PAR-1依赖性信号传导的影响更强。关于这些发现的潜在机制,APC介导的PAR-1激动作用可抑制LPS诱导的血管活性肽肾上腺髓质素增加以及诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)阳性白细胞浸润到肾组织中。然而,APC的抗凝功能负责抑制LPS诱导的促炎介质血管紧张素转换酶-1(ACE-1)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和白细胞介素-18(IL-18)的刺激,这可能解释了其调节肾血流动力学的能力。两种变体均降低了活化的半胱天冬酶-3水平,并消除了LPS诱导的肾功能不全和病理变化。我们得出结论,虽然PAR-1激动作用单独负责APC介导的全身血流动力学改善,但APC的两种功能在减轻肾脏对损伤的反应中发挥着不同的作用。