Kim Allis, Khoury Lisa, Schweitzer Mark, Jazrawi Laith, Ishak Charbel, Meislin Robert, Kummer Fred, Sherman Orrin H
Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University, NYU Langone Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):272-5.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate any differences in the accuracy of knee MRI interpretation between radiology and orthopaedic surgery residents as well as to evaluate differences in quality of interpretation relative to resident training level. In this study, 20 MRI scans demonstrating specific pathology of the knee were identified. From one institution, two radiology residents and two orthopaedic surgery residents of each postgraduate year (PGY) of training (2 to 5) were recruited. Each resident was asked to interpret all the studies and choose up to 16 diagnoses for each scan from the list provided. Orthopaedic surgery residents showed improvement in overall accuracy and specificity with each year of additional training. Level of training did not correspond with increased sensitivity in the orthopaedic residents tested. Radiology residents did not demonstrate a consistent trend toward improved accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity with additional years of training. The only statistically significant differences in specificity observed between the two groups were seen in the readings of ACL tears, lateral femoral condyle chondromalacia, and chondromalacia patella. This study found that the accuracy of knee MRI interpretations between radiology and orthopaedic surgery residents did not demonstrate any differences. Level of training had no effect on the interpretation of the MRIs by radiology residents. Orthopaedic surgery residents did show an improvement with each year of additional training.
