McNab W B, Meek A H, Duncan J R, Brooks B W, Van Dreumel A A, Martin S W, Nielsen K H, Sugden E A, Turcotte C
Animal Diseases Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ontario.
Can J Vet Res. 1991 Jul;55(3):252-9.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the lipoarabinomannan antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (LAM-ELISA), carbohydrate antigen complement fixation (CH-CFT), and protein D antigen agar gel immunodiffusion (D-AGID) tests for bovine paratuberculosis, relative to histopathology, and to culture and isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from tissues and feces. Samples for test evaluation were collected from four sources including blood and tissues from 400 cull cows at three abattoirs in Ontario, blood and feces from a paratuberculosis survey of cattle from 120 dairy farms in Ontario, a serum bank containing samples from cattle from Ontario and Québec, and a bank of sera from cattle from Pennsylvania and the northeastern United States. The data were analyzed using receiver operator characteristic curves, estimates of relative sensitivity and specificity, and kappa statistics of agreement between tests. The LAM-ELISA performed significantly better than both the CH-CFT and the D-AGID tests. The LAM-ELISA was better at predicting fecal shedding status than tissue infection. However, the LAM-ELISA also had limitations. When interpreted as positive or negative (+/-), at a critical optical density of 0.675, its sensitivity and specificity relative to bacteriology were 49% and 87% respectively. Although the serological tests examined in this study provided some information, they did not predict well the infection status of individual animals.
本研究的目的是评估脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖抗原酶联免疫吸附测定(LAM-ELISA)、碳水化合物抗原补体结合试验(CH-CFT)和蛋白D抗原琼脂凝胶免疫扩散试验(D-AGID)检测牛副结核病的性能,与组织病理学以及从组织和粪便中培养和分离副结核分枝杆菌的方法进行比较。用于试验评估的样本从四个来源收集,包括安大略省三个屠宰场的400头淘汰奶牛的血液和组织、安大略省120个奶牛场牛副结核病调查的血液和粪便、一个包含安大略省和魁北克省牛样本的血清库,以及一个来自宾夕法尼亚州和美国东北部牛的血清库。使用受试者工作特征曲线、相对敏感性和特异性估计值以及试验间一致性的kappa统计量对数据进行分析。LAM-ELISA的表现明显优于CH-CFT和D-AGID试验。LAM-ELISA在预测粪便排菌状态方面比组织感染情况更好。然而,LAM-ELISA也有局限性。当以阳性或阴性(+/-)进行判读时,在临界光密度为0.675时,其相对于细菌学的敏感性和特异性分别为49%和87%。尽管本研究中检测的血清学试验提供了一些信息,但它们并不能很好地预测个体动物的感染状态。