Fernández-Rivas Montserrat, Benito Cristina, González-Mancebo Eloína, de Durana Dolores Alonso Díaz
Servicio de Alergia, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008 Dec;19(8):675-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00821.x.
Allergic reactions to fruits and vegetables are frequently observed in older children and adolescents. They can result from a primary sensitization to food allergens or from a primary sensitization to inhalant allergens such as pollens or latex. In the case of fruit allergies, the stability of the allergens involved is crucial to the sensitization pathway and in the clinical presentation of the food allergy. Two patients allergic to fruits are presented and discussed in the light of the allergens involved. Patient 1 was a 14 yr-old girl with a grass and olive pollen allergy who developed oropharyngeal symptoms typical of the oral allergy syndrome (OAS) with multiple fruits from taxonomically unrelated families, and who was sensitized to profilin. Patient 2 was an 8 yr-old girl, with no pollen allergies, who developed systemic reactions to peach and apple, and who was sensitized to non-specific lipid transfer proteins (LTP). Profilins are labile allergens present in pollens and foods, and sensitization occurs through the respiratory route to pollen profilin. The cross-reactive IgE antibodies generated can elicit local reactions in the oropharyngeal mucosa (OAS) when exposed to fruit profilins. In contrast, LTPs are a family of stable allergens that resist thermal treatment and enzymatic digestion, and can thus behave as true food allergens inducing primary (non-pollen related) sensitizations and triggering systemic reactions. These two cases represent two distinct patterns of sensitization and clinical expression of fruit allergies that are determined by the panallergens involved (LTPs and profilins) and their intrinsic physicochemical properties. Additionally, these two cases also show the improved diagnostic value of Component Resolved Diagnosis, and strengthen its utility in the routine diagnosis and management of patients.
在大龄儿童和青少年中,经常会观察到对水果和蔬菜的过敏反应。这些反应可能源于对食物过敏原的初次致敏,也可能源于对吸入性过敏原(如花粉或乳胶)的初次致敏。就水果过敏而言,所涉及过敏原的稳定性对于致敏途径以及食物过敏的临床表现至关重要。本文介绍了两名水果过敏患者,并根据所涉及的过敏原进行讨论。患者1是一名14岁女孩,对草和橄榄花粉过敏,食用来自分类学上不相关科的多种水果时出现了典型的口腔过敏综合征(OAS)的口咽症状,且对肌动蛋白结合蛋白致敏。患者2是一名8岁女孩,无花粉过敏,对桃子和苹果出现全身反应,且对非特异性脂质转移蛋白(LTP)致敏。肌动蛋白结合蛋白是存在于花粉和食物中的不稳定过敏原,通过呼吸道途径对花粉肌动蛋白结合蛋白致敏。产生的交叉反应性IgE抗体在接触水果肌动蛋白结合蛋白时可引发口咽黏膜的局部反应(OAS)。相比之下,LTP是一类稳定的过敏原,能抵抗热处理和酶消化,因此可作为真正的食物过敏原,引发初次(与花粉无关)致敏并触发全身反应。这两个病例代表了水果过敏致敏和临床表达的两种不同模式,它们由所涉及的泛过敏原(LTP和肌动蛋白结合蛋白)及其内在物理化学性质决定。此外,这两个病例还显示了组分分辨诊断的诊断价值有所提高,并强化了其在患者常规诊断和管理中的效用。