Stafford Jennifer B, Eoff Robert L, Kozekova Albena, Rizzo Carmelo J, Guengerich F Peter, Marnett Lawrence J
Department of Chemistry, A. B. Hancock, Jr., Memorial Laboratory for Cancer Research, Center in Molecular Toxicology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Biochemistry. 2009 Jan 20;48(2):471-80. doi: 10.1021/bi801591a.
M(1)dG (3-(2'-deoxy-beta-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)pyrimido[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one) lesions are mutagenic in bacterial and mammalian cells, leading to base substitutions (mostly M(1)dG to dT and M(1)dG to dA) and frameshift mutations. M(1)dG is produced endogenously through the reaction of peroxidation products, base propenal or malondialdehyde, with deoxyguanosine residues in DNA. The mutagenicity of M(1)dG in Escherichia coli is dependent on the SOS response, specifically the umuC and umuD gene products, suggesting that mutagenic lesion bypass occurs by the action of translesion DNA polymerases, like DNA polymerase V. Bypass of DNA lesions by translesion DNA polymerases is conserved in bacteria, yeast, and mammalian cells. The ability of recombinant human DNA polymerase eta to synthesize DNA across from M(1)dG was studied. M(1)dG partially blocked DNA synthesis by polymerase eta. Using steady-state kinetics, we found that insertion of dCTP was the least favored insertion product opposite the M(1)dG lesion (800-fold less efficient than opposite dG). Extension from M(1)dG.dC was equally as efficient as from control primer-templates (dG.dC). dATP insertion opposite M(1)dG was the most favored insertion product (8-fold less efficient than opposite dG), but extension from M(1)dG.dA was 20-fold less efficient than dG.dC. The sequences of full-length human DNA polymerase eta bypass products of M(1)dG were determined by LC-ESI/MS/MS. Bypass products contained incorporation of dA (52%) or dC (16%) opposite M(1)dG or -1 frameshifts at the lesion site (31%). Human DNA polymerase eta bypass may lead to M(1)dG to dT and frameshift but likely not M(1)dG to dA mutations during DNA replication.
M(1)dG(3-(2'-脱氧-β-D-赤藓糖基)嘧啶并[1,2-a]嘌呤-10(3H)-酮)损伤在细菌和哺乳动物细胞中具有致突变性,会导致碱基替换(主要是M(1)dG突变为dT以及M(1)dG突变为dA)和移码突变。M(1)dG是通过过氧化产物、碱基丙烯醛或丙二醛与DNA中的脱氧鸟苷残基反应而内源性产生的。M(1)dG在大肠杆菌中的致突变性依赖于SOS反应,特别是umuC和umuD基因产物,这表明致突变损伤的跨越是通过跨损伤DNA聚合酶(如DNA聚合酶V)的作用发生的。跨损伤DNA聚合酶对DNA损伤的跨越在细菌、酵母和哺乳动物细胞中是保守的。研究了重组人DNA聚合酶η跨越M(1)dG合成DNA的能力。M(1)dG部分阻断了聚合酶η的DNA合成。使用稳态动力学,我们发现dCTP的插入是与M(1)dG损伤相对时最不被青睐的插入产物(效率比与dG相对时低800倍)。从M(1)dG.dC延伸与从对照引物模板(dG.dC)延伸效率相同。与M(1)dG相对时dATP的插入是最被青睐的插入产物(效率比与dG相对时低8倍),但从M(1)dG.dA延伸的效率比dG.dC低20倍。通过液相色谱-电喷雾电离串联质谱法(LC-ESI/MS/MS)确定了M(1)dG的全长人DNA聚合酶η跨越产物的序列。跨越产物包含在M(1)dG相对位置掺入dA(52%)或dC(16%),或在损伤位点出现-1移码(31%)。人DNA聚合酶η的跨越可能导致DNA复制过程中M(1)dG突变为dT和移码,但可能不会导致M(1)dG突变为dA突变。