• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抽象词与具体词表征的质性差异:来自视觉世界范式的证据

Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

作者信息

Duñabeitia Jon Andoni, Avilés Alberto, Afonso Olivia, Scheepers Christoph, Carreiras Manuel

机构信息

Instituto de Tecnologías Biomédicas, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain.

出版信息

Cognition. 2009 Feb;110(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.012. Epub 2008 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.012
PMID:19110239
Abstract

In the present visual-world experiment, participants were presented with visual displays that included a target item that was a semantic associate of an abstract or a concrete word. This manipulation allowed us to test a basic prediction derived from the qualitatively different representational framework that supports the view of different organizational principles for concrete and abstract words in semantic memory. Our results confirm the assumption of a primary organizational principle based on association for abstract words, different from the semantic similarity principle proposed for concrete words, and provide the first piece of evidence in support of this view obtained from healthy participants. The results shed light on the representational structure of abstract and concrete concepts.

摘要

在当前的视觉世界实验中,向参与者呈现视觉显示,其中包括一个目标项目,该目标项目是一个抽象词或具体词的语义关联项。这种操作使我们能够测试从性质不同的表征框架得出的一个基本预测,该框架支持语义记忆中具体词和抽象词具有不同组织原则的观点。我们的结果证实了基于关联的抽象词主要组织原则的假设,这与为具体词提出的语义相似性原则不同,并提供了从健康参与者获得的支持这一观点的首个证据。这些结果揭示了抽象概念和具体概念的表征结构。

相似文献

1
Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: evidence from the visual-world paradigm.抽象词与具体词表征的质性差异:来自视觉世界范式的证据
Cognition. 2009 Feb;110(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.012. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
2
Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks.抽象概念和具体概念在结构上具有不同的表征框架。
Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):615-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh349. Epub 2004 Nov 17.
3
The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: evidence from odd-one-out judgements.支撑抽象知识和具体知识的不同表征框架:来自异类判断的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jul;62(7):1377-88, 1388-90. doi: 10.1080/17470210802483834. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
4
Qualitatively different semantic representations for abstract and concrete words: further evidence from the semantic reading errors of deep dyslexic patients.抽象词和具体词在语义表征上的质性差异:来自深层诵读困难患者语义阅读错误的进一步证据。
Neurocase. 2006 Apr;12(2):91-7. doi: 10.1080/13554790500507172.
5
The different frameworks underlying abstract and concrete knowledge: evidence from a bilingual patient with a semantic refractory access dysphasia.抽象知识和具体知识背后的不同框架:来自一名患有语义难治性获取性失语症的双语患者的证据。
Neurocase. 2006 Jun;12(3):151-63. doi: 10.1080/13554790600598832.
6
Differential effects of normal aging on recollection of concrete and abstract words.正常衰老对具体词汇和抽象词汇记忆的不同影响。
Neuropsychology. 2008 Mar;22(2):255-61. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.2.255.
7
Are there qualitative differences in the representation of abstract and concrete words? Within-language and cross-language evidence from the semantic priming paradigm.抽象词和具体词的表征是否存在质的差异?来自语义启动范式的语言内和跨语言证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(12):2402-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1016980. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
8
Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.旁中央凹加工中的右视野优势:来自眼动注视相关电位的证据。
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):101-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
9
Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.抽象概念特征评分可预测书面单词数组中的注视:来自视觉单词范式的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):659-685. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12348. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
10
The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: a comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words.情感概念的独特性:情感词、抽象词和具体词之间的比较
Am J Psychol. 2004 Fall;117(3):389-410.

引用本文的文献

1
The differential illusion memory for high-associated abstract concepts (DIM-HA) effect.高关联抽象概念的差异错觉记忆(DIM-HA)效应。
Cogn Process. 2024 Nov;25(4):575-586. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01220-1. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
Unseen but influential associates: Properties of words' associates influence lexical and semantic processing.隐形但有影响力的伴随者:词的伴随者的属性影响词汇和语义处理。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2257-2265. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02485-5. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper.
具身语义与语言的脑特征:一篇共识论文。
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):61. doi: 10.5334/joc.237. eCollection 2023.
4
The influence of conceptual concreteness on the reading acquisition and integration of novel words into semantic memory via thematic relations.概念具体性对新词通过主题关系进行阅读习得并融入语义记忆的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 11;14:1132039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132039. eCollection 2023.
5
The Nature of Word Associations in Sentence Contexts.句子语境中的词汇联想的本质。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(2):104-110. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000547. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
6
"Looking at" Negation: Faster Processing for Symbolic Rather Than Iconic Representations.“看”否定:符号表示比图像表示处理更快。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec;50(6):1417-1436. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09797-w. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
Thematic and other semantic relations central to abstract (and concrete) concepts.与抽象(和具体)概念相关的主题和其他语义关系。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2399-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01484-8. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
8
Dual n-back working memory training evinces superior transfer effects compared to the method of loci.双 n 回工作记忆训练比位置法显示出更好的迁移效果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82663-w.
9
Semantic similarity and associated abstractness norms for 630 French word pairs.630 对法汉单词对的语义相似度及相关抽象度规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1166-1178. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01488-z. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
Overlapping connectivity patterns during semantic processing of abstract and concrete words revealed with multivariate Granger Causality analysis.基于多元 Granger 因果分析的抽象词和具体词语义加工过程中重叠连接模式的研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 18;10(1):2803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59473-7.