Chessick Richard D
Northwestern University, IL, USA.
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2008 Winter;36(4):677-706. doi: 10.1521/jaap.2008.36.4.677.
Do changes in psychoanalytic technique represent progress in knowledge or are they for the most part a sideways movement in tune with the particular changes in the socioeconomic milieu of the day? Hegel raised the question in the area of philosophy when discussing the stages in the development of self-consciousness. For him this was an inevitable development toward a greater and greater self-understanding, going through various phases until Absolute Spirit (Mind) became completely cognizant of itself. This metaphysical conception was the cornerstone of Hegel's thought as first presented in his chaotic masterpiece, Phenomenology of Spirit. In this article I will examine his philosophical vision as expressed in that masterpiece, compare it with that of Freud, and discuss aspects of it that are pertinent to the practice of contemporary psychoanalysis.
精神分析技术的变化是代表了知识的进步,还是在很大程度上只是与当时社会经济环境的特定变化同步的一种横向变动呢?黑格尔在哲学领域讨论自我意识发展阶段时提出了这个问题。对他而言,这是朝着越来越深入的自我理解的必然发展,要历经各个阶段,直至绝对精神(心灵)完全认识自身。这种形而上学的概念是黑格尔思想的基石,首次在他那部晦涩难懂的杰作《精神现象学》中呈现。在本文中,我将审视他在这部杰作中所表达的哲学视野,将其与弗洛伊德的视野进行比较,并探讨其中与当代精神分析实践相关的方面。