通过围产期小组促进健康妊娠：CenteringPregnancy®小组产前护理与分娩教育课程的比较
Promoting Healthy Pregnancies Through Perinatal Groups: A Comparison of CenteringPregnancy(R) Group Prenatal Care and Childbirth Education Classes.
作者信息
Walker Deborah S, Worrell Renee
机构信息
DEBORAH WALKER is an associate professor in the College of Nursing and School of Medicine, OB/GYN, at Wayne State University (WSU) in Detroit, Michigan. She is the WSU Graduate Program Director, Advanced Practice Nursing with Women, Neonates and Children and the Coordinator of the Women's Health Nurse Practitioner and Nurse-Midwife education programs. She has been active in midwifery practice, education, and research focusing on promoting healthy pregnancies for almost 20 years.
出版信息
J Perinat Educ. 2008 Winter;17(1):27-34. doi: 10.1624/105812408X267934.
Abstract
CenteringPregnancy(R) group prenatal care is growing in popularity and has commonalities with childbirth education classes. In order for leaders of childbirth education classes to best serve their clients' needs, it is important to be aware of new, emerging models of prenatal care such as CenteringPregnancy. This article provides an overview of CenteringPregnancy and similarities and differences between CenteringPregnancy and childbirth education classes. Providers of prenatal education, whether it is within CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care or in childbirth education classes, have a common important aim: promoting positive perinatal outcomes.
摘要
“以孕妇为中心”（CenteringPregnancy®）小组产前护理越来越受欢迎，并且与分娩教育课程有共同之处。为了使分娩教育课程的负责人能够最好地满足其客户的需求，了解诸如“以孕妇为中心”之类的新型产前护理模式非常重要。本文概述了“以孕妇为中心”以及“以孕妇为中心”与分娩教育课程之间的异同。产前教育提供者，无论是在“以孕妇为中心”小组产前护理中还是在分娩教育课程中，都有一个共同的重要目标：促进良好的围产期结局。
相似文献
1
Promoting Healthy Pregnancies Through Perinatal Groups: A Comparison of CenteringPregnancy(R) Group Prenatal Care and Childbirth Education Classes.通过围产期小组促进健康妊娠：CenteringPregnancy®小组产前护理与分娩教育课程的比较
J Perinat Educ. 2008 Winter;17(1):27-34. doi: 10.1624/105812408X267934.
2
Implementing CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care for Minority Women Living with HIV at an Urban University Hospital.为城市大学医院的 HIV 阳性少数民族妇女实施集中孕期小组产前护理。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Jul;64(4):451-461. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12987. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
Self-management support by health care providers in prenatal Shared Medical Appointments (CenteringPregnancy©) and prenatal individual appointments.医疗保健提供者在产前共享医疗预约（CenteringPregnancy©）和产前个人预约中提供的自我管理支持。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Feb;107:107579. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.107579. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care.拉美裔女性在集中妊娠组产前护理中的结局与个体产前护理的比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12000. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
5
Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education.比较核心孕期护理与标准产前护理加产前教育。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S5. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
6
Women's Perceived Quality of Care and Self-Reported Empowerment With CenteringPregnancy Versus Individual Prenatal Care.与个体产前护理相比，女性对“以孕妇为中心的孕期护理模式”的护理质量感知及自我报告的赋权情况
Nurs Womens Health. 2019 Jun;23(3):234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 May 8.
7
Integrating a Nurse-Midwife-Led Oral Health Intervention Into CenteringPregnancy Prenatal Care: Results of a Pilot Study.将由助产士主导的口腔健康干预措施纳入集中孕期产前护理：一项试点研究的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jul;62(4):463-469. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12613. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
8
Group Prenatal Care Results in Medicaid Savings with Better Outcomes: A Propensity Score Analysis of CenteringPregnancy Participation in South Carolina.群组产前护理可节省医疗补助并带来更好的结果：南卡罗来纳州孕期中心参与情况的倾向得分分析
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jul;20(7):1384-93. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1935-y.
9
The Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Interpregnancy Interval.群组产前护理对孕中期间隔的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 2023 Nov;40(15):1659-1664. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739413. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
10
The Effect of Centering Pregnancy versus Traditional Prenatal Care Models on Improved Adolescent Health Behaviors in the Perinatal Period.以孕妇为中心的护理模式与传统产前护理模式对改善围产期青少年健康行为的影响。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Oct;28(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
引用本文的文献
1
Association Between Patient-Reported Social Needs and Birth Outcomes After Implementation of Universal Screening.实施普遍筛查后患者报告的社会需求与出生结局之间的关联
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 22;146(1):138-146. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005942.
2
Area Poverty and Adverse Birth Outcomes: An Opportunity for Quality Improvement.地区贫困与不良出生结局：质量改进的契机。
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb 1;145(2):231-240. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005809. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
Perspectives of pregnant women on maternal health information handouts at KwaZulu-Natal sub-district.夸祖鲁-纳塔尔地区孕妇对母婴健康信息手册的看法。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Feb 29;16(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4158.
4
Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a digital questionnaire for the evaluation of perinatal psychosocial needs.开发和评估一种用于评估围产期心理社会需求的数字问卷的心理计量学特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06050-1.
5
The Effect of Structured Antenatal Education on Childbirth Self-Efficacy.结构化产前教育对分娩自我效能感的影响。
Cureus. 2023 May 21;15(5):e39285. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39285. eCollection 2023 May.
6
How can healthcare professionals provide guidance and support to parents of adolescents? Results from a primary care-based study.医疗保健专业人员如何为青少年的父母提供指导和支持？一项基于初级保健的研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06200-1.
7
Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico.评估墨西哥实施小组产前护理过程中的保真度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05430-z.
8
Perceived strategies to reduce traumatic childbirth amongst Iranian childbearing women: a qualitative study.伊朗产妇减轻分娩创伤的认知策略：一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 8;20(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03045-0.
9
Effects of March of Dimes Supportive Pregnancy Care on Maternal and Infant Health Across Diverse Patient Populations: a Quasi-Experimental Multi-Site Pilot Study.多事之秋支持性妊娠护理对不同患者人群母婴健康的影响：一项准实验多地点试点研究。
Prev Sci. 2020 Apr;21(3):293-307. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01083-5.
10
Co-producing childbirth knowledge: a qualitative study of birth stories in antenatal sessions.共同构建分娩知识：产前课程中分娩故事的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 26;19(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2605-z.
本文引用的文献
1
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
2
Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.小组产前护理与围产期结局：一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):330-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275284.24298.23.
3
Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both.针对分娩或为人父母，或两者的个人或团体产前教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD002869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.pub2.
4
Comparison of selected outcomes of CenteringPregnancy versus traditional prenatal care.“以家庭为中心的孕期护理”与传统产前护理特定结局的比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006 Jul-Aug;51(4):266-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.11.011.
5
Group visits: a qualitative review of current research.小组问诊：当前研究的定性综述
J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):276-90. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.3.276.
6
Revolutionizing prenatal care: new evidence-based prenatal care delivery models.革新产前护理：新的循证产前护理提供模式
J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 2004;35(2):18-21.
7
Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a CenteringPregnancy program.参加围产期保健小组项目的青少年的妊娠结局。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;49(5):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.05.009.
8
CenteringPregnancy and the current state of prenatal care.以孕妇为中心及产前护理的现状。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;49(5):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.06.001.
9
Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics.群组产前护理与早产体重：公立诊所配对队列研究的结果
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):1051-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00765-8.
10
Childbirth education classes: sociodemographic disparities in attendance and the association of attendance with breastfeeding initiation.分娩教育课程：参与情况的社会人口统计学差异以及参与情况与母乳喂养开始之间的关联。
Matern Child Health J. 2003 Jun;7(2):87-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1023812826136.
Zotero 插件