Suppr超能文献

家庭医学中预防性程序提醒的应用。

Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine.

作者信息

Rosser W W, McDowell I, Newell C

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1991 Oct 1;145(7):807-14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of three computerized reminder systems in the delivery of five preventive procedures in family practice.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 8502 patients 15 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5883 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group (passive) or a telephone or letter reminder group (active). The remaining 2619 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored.

INTERVENTION

During 1 year the patients in the active reminder groups received a telephone call or letter reminding them of any overdue preventive procedures; for those in the passive reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to provide any overdue service.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Rates of completion of the preventive procedures required.

MAIN RESULTS

All three reminder systems significantly improved the delivery of preventive services (p less than 0.001). The procedure completion rates were 42.0% in the letter reminder group, 42.0% in the telephone reminder group, 33.7% in the physician reminder group and 14.1% in the randomized control group. The use of a letter was more cost-effective than the telephone system, but the physician reminder system was the most cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

Computerized reminder systems do improve the delivery of preventive services in family practice.

摘要

目的

比较三种计算机提醒系统在家庭医疗中提供五项预防性医疗程序的有效性。

设计

前瞻性、随机对照研究。

地点

渥太华市民医院家庭医学中心。

参与者

在8502名15岁及以上未住院或未在医疗机构的患者中,5883名患者按家庭随机分为对照组、医生提醒组(被动)或电话或信件提醒组(主动)。其余2619名患者未纳入研究的随机部分,但进行了监测。

干预

在1年期间,主动提醒组的患者接到电话或信件,提醒他们任何逾期的预防性医疗程序;对于被动提醒组的患者,在门诊时提醒医生提供任何逾期服务。

观察指标

所需预防性医疗程序的完成率。

主要结果

所有三种提醒系统均显著提高了预防性服务的提供(p<0.001)。信件提醒组的程序完成率为42.0%,电话提醒组为42.0%,医生提醒组为33.7%,随机对照组为14.1%。使用信件比电话系统更具成本效益,但医生提醒系统是最具成本效益的。

结论

计算机提醒系统确实能改善家庭医疗中预防性服务的提供。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.患者介导的干预措施以改善专业实践。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2.
4
Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.提高免疫接种率的患者提醒与召回干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 18;1(1):CD003941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
Who is being screened for cervical cancer?哪些人正在接受宫颈癌筛查?
Am J Public Health. 1981 Jan;71(1):73-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.1.73.
8
Cervical cancer detection in British Columbia. A progress report.不列颠哥伦比亚省的宫颈癌检测。进展报告。
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 Apr;75(4):392-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1968.tb00136.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验