McDowell I, Newell C, Rosser W
CMAJ. 1986 Nov 1;135(9):991-7.
Despite recommendations supporting annual influenza vaccination for people aged 65 years or older, vaccination rates remain low. Several studies have evaluated the effect of sending mailed reminders, but few have compared alternative ways of reminding patients to receive the vaccine. In a randomized trial of 939 patients aged 65 years or older in four family practices carried out between Oct. 23 and Dec. 31, 1984, we compared three ways of reminding elderly patients to receive the vaccine: personal reminder by the physician, telephone reminder by the nurse and reminder by letter. The vaccination rates for the three groups were 22.9%, 37% and 35.1% respectively. No reminder was issued to a control group, and the rate was 9.8%. Some patients could not be reached by telephone, and some did not see the physician during the specified time. Among the patients whom the nurse actually contacted, the vaccination rate was 43.5%; the rate for patients whom the doctor actually saw was 45.1%. Overall, a telephone reminder by the nurse was the most effective method, and at an hourly salary of $16 or less this method would also be the most cost-effective. The reminders used in this study were automatically generated from a computerized medical record system. The study shows how a computerized system can be used to identify patients for whom preventive procedures are due.
尽管有建议支持65岁及以上人群每年接种流感疫苗,但接种率仍然很低。几项研究评估了邮寄提醒的效果,但很少有研究比较提醒患者接种疫苗的其他方式。在1984年10月23日至12月31日期间对四个家庭诊所的939名65岁及以上患者进行的一项随机试验中,我们比较了三种提醒老年患者接种疫苗的方式:医生亲自提醒、护士电话提醒和信件提醒。三组的接种率分别为22.9%、37%和35.1%。对照组未发出提醒,接种率为9.8%。有些患者无法通过电话联系到,有些患者在规定时间内未见到医生。在护士实际联系的患者中,接种率为43.5%;医生实际诊治的患者接种率为45.1%。总体而言,护士电话提醒是最有效的方法,以每小时16美元或更低的工资计算,这种方法也是最具成本效益的。本研究中使用的提醒是由计算机化医疗记录系统自动生成的。该研究展示了如何使用计算机化系统来识别应接受预防性程序的患者。