Kojima Sho, Onishi Hideaki, Sugawara Kazuhiro, Miyaguchi Shota, Kirimoto Hikari, Tamaki Hiroyuki, Shirozu Hiroshi, Kameyama Shigeki
Graduate School of Health and Welfare, Niigata University of Health and Welfare Niigata City, Niigata, Japan ; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare Niigata City, Niigata, Japan ; Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital Narashino City, Chiba, Japan.
Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 23;8:1023. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01023. eCollection 2014.
Primary motor cortex (M1) excitability can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and can be modulated by a conditioning electrical stimulus delivered to a peripheral nerve prior to TMS. This is known as afferent facilitation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine whether AF can be induced by digital nerve stimulation and to evaluate the relation between the interstimulus interval (ISI) required for AF and the latency of the E2 component of the cutaneomuscular reflex (CMR) and the prominent somatosensory evoked field (SEF) deflection that occurs approximately 70 ms after digital nerve stimulation (P60m). Stimulation of the digital nerve of the right index finger was followed, at various time intervals, by single-pulse TMS applied to the contralateral hemisphere. The ISI between digital nerve stimulation and TMS was 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 100, 140, 180, 200, or 220 ms. Single-pulse TMS was performed alone as a control. SEFs were recorded following digital nerve stimulation of the index finger, and the equivalent current dipole of prominent deflections that occurred around 70 ms after the stimulation was calculated. CMRs were recorded following digital nerve stimulation during muscle contraction. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were facilitated at an ISI between 50 and 100 ms in 11 of 13 subjects, and the facilitated MEP amplitude was larger than the unconditioned MEP amplitude (p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the ISI at which AF was maximal and the latency of the P60m component of the SEF (r = -0.50, p = 0.12) or the E2 component of the CMR (r = -0.54, p = 0.88). These results indicate that the precise ISI required for AF cannot be predicted using SEF or CMR.
初级运动皮层(M1)的兴奋性可通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)进行评估,并且可通过在TMS之前施加于外周神经的条件电刺激来调节。这被称为传入易化(AF)。本研究的目的是确定是否可通过指神经刺激诱导AF,并评估AF所需的刺激间隔(ISI)与皮肤肌肉反射(CMR)的E2成分潜伏期以及指神经刺激后约70毫秒出现的显著体感诱发电场(SEF)偏转(P60m)之间的关系。在不同时间间隔对右手食指的指神经进行刺激后,对同侧半球施加单脉冲TMS。指神经刺激与TMS之间的ISI为20、30、40、50、60、70、80、100、140、180、200或220毫秒。单脉冲TMS单独进行作为对照。在对食指进行指神经刺激后记录SEF,并计算刺激后约70毫秒出现的显著偏转的等效电流偶极。在肌肉收缩期间对指神经刺激后记录CMR。13名受试者中有11名在ISI为50至100毫秒时运动诱发电位(MEP)得到易化,且易化后的MEP波幅大于未条件化的MEP波幅(p<0.01)。AF最大时的ISI与SEF的P60m成分潜伏期(r = -0.50,p = 0.12)或CMR的E2成分潜伏期(r = -0.54,p = 0.88)之间无显著相关性。这些结果表明,无法使用SEF或CMR预测AF所需的精确ISI。