• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两款手动牙刷刷牙时间及牙菌斑清除潜力的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes.

作者信息

Terézhalmy G T, Biesbrock A R, Walters P A, Grender J M, Bartizek R D

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Dental School, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Nov;6(4):321-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00327.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00327.x
PMID:19138183
Abstract

AIM

To compare plaque removal efficacy of Oral-B CrossAction (CA) used for 1 min with an American Dental Association (ADA) manual toothbrush used for 2 or 5 min in an examiner-blind, three-treatment, six-period crossover study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After refraining from all oral hygiene procedures for 23-25 h, subjects were randomly assigned to one of nine possible six-period (visit) treatment sequences. Plaque was assessed at baseline (Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index). Post-brushing scores were recorded after brushing with a marketed dentifrice and the assigned toothbrush for the specified duration. The same procedure was followed at each of six subsequent visits. Clinical measurements were carried out by the same examiner.

RESULTS

Forty subjects completed the study. All three treatments effectively removed plaque from the whole mouth, along the gingival margin and from approximal surfaces. Whole mouth and gingival margin plaque removal scores with CA for 1 min did not differ significantly from scores with the ADA toothbrush used for 2 min. The ADA brush used for 5 min showed significantly greater whole mouth (P < 0.001) and gingival margin (P < 0.001) plaque reduction than the two other treatments. Approximal plaque removal scores did not differ between the three treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficient plaque removal can be achieved after 1 min of brushing with CA. The amount of plaque removed did not differ significantly from that achieved with the ADA brush after 2 min of brushing. Greater whole mouth and gingival margin plaque removal scores were seen with the ADA brush after 5 min.

摘要

目的

在一项检查者盲法、三治疗组、六阶段交叉研究中,比较使用1分钟的欧乐B交叉动作(CA)牙刷与使用2分钟或5分钟的美国牙科协会(ADA)手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。

材料与方法

在停止所有口腔卫生措施23 - 25小时后,受试者被随机分配到九种可能的六阶段(就诊)治疗顺序中的一种。在基线时(Rustogi改良海军牙菌斑指数)评估牙菌斑。在用市售牙膏和指定牙刷按规定时间刷牙后记录刷牙后的得分。在随后的六次就诊中每次都遵循相同的程序。临床测量由同一名检查者进行。

结果

40名受试者完成了研究。所有三种治疗方法都能有效清除全口、龈缘和邻面的牙菌斑。使用CA牙刷1分钟的全口和龈缘牙菌斑清除得分与使用ADA牙刷2分钟的得分无显著差异。使用ADA牙刷5分钟时,全口(P < 0.001)和龈缘(P < 0.001)牙菌斑减少量显著大于其他两种治疗方法。三种治疗方法的邻面牙菌斑清除得分无差异。

结论

使用CA牙刷刷牙1分钟后可有效清除牙菌斑。其清除的牙菌斑量与使用ADA牙刷刷牙2分钟后的清除量无显著差异。使用ADA牙刷5分钟后,全口和龈缘牙菌斑清除得分更高。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes.两款手动牙刷刷牙时间及牙菌斑清除潜力的临床评估
Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Nov;6(4):321-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00327.x.
2
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
3
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.
4
Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact.带有超声波波导的声波牙刷在有刷毛接触和无刷毛接触情况下对牙菌斑清除效果的临床评估。
Am J Dent. 2008 Apr;21(2):83-7.
5
Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.一种新型电池驱动牙刷与市售手动牙刷在清除已形成的龈上菌斑方面的比较疗效:一项针对成年人的一次性交叉研究。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):57-61.
6
Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.两种牙菌斑指数在评估牙刷效果中的相关性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):1-9.
7
A comparative clinical investigation of a novel toothbrush designed to enhance plaque removal efficacy.
Am J Dent. 2000 Mar;13(Spec No):21A-26A.
8
An advanced toothbrush with improved plaque removal efficacy.
Am J Dent. 2000 Mar;13(Spec No):15A-19A.
9
Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush. results from two independent studies.电动牙刷功效的临床评估。两项独立研究的结果。
Am J Dent. 2001 Oct;14(5):273-7.
10
Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype manual toothbrush versus an ADA reference manual toothbrush with and without dental floss.一款原型手动牙刷与一款ADA参考手动牙刷在使用牙线和不使用牙线情况下的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005 Aug 15;6(3):1-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Don't Rush with Your Brush: An Study on Toothbrush Hygiene.别急着用牙刷:一项关于牙刷卫生的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;17(2):162-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776.
2
Dental Biofilm Removal and Bacterial Contamination of a New Doubled-Side Thermoplastic Polyurethane-Based Toothbrush: A Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.新型双面热塑性聚氨酯牙刷的牙菌斑清除及细菌污染情况:一项针对健康志愿者的交叉研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 22;11(10):1296. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101296.
3
Evaluation of the isosceles-configured SUN Teethtoothbrush in dental plaque removal and gingival health.
评价 SUN 牙间刷(等腰型)在牙菌斑清除和牙龈健康方面的效果。
Can J Dent Hyg. 2021 Jun 1;55(2):101-109.
4
Efficacy of a Hybrid Toothbrush versus Comparative Manual Toothbrush for Plaque Removal - Randomized In-Use Study.混合牙刷与对照手动牙刷去除牙菌斑的效果比较——随机使用研究
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Jun 29;12:241-250. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S257411. eCollection 2020.
5
A 12-week, multicenter, normal-use evaluation of a manual toothbrush with angled bristle design.一项对具有斜角刷毛设计的手动牙刷进行的为期12周的多中心正常使用评估。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):469-474. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_529_18.
6
Effectiveness of erythrosine-mediated photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy on dental plaque aerobic microorganisms: A randomized controlled trial.赤藓红介导的光动力抗菌化疗对牙菌斑需氧微生物的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 May-Jun;21(3):210-215. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_157_17.
7
Distribution of dental plaque and gingivitis within the dental arches.牙弓内牙菌斑和牙龈炎的分布情况。
J Int Med Res. 2017 Oct;45(5):1585-1596. doi: 10.1177/0300060517705476. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
Comparison of Three types of Tooth Brushes on Plaque and Gingival Indices: A Randomized Clinical Trial.三种牙刷对菌斑和牙龈指数影响的比较:一项随机临床试验
Open Dent J. 2017 Feb 28;11:126-132. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010126. eCollection 2017.
9
Comparison of manual toothbrushes with different bristle designs in terms of cleaning efficacy and potential role on gingival recession.不同刷毛设计的手动牙刷在清洁效果及对牙龈退缩的潜在作用方面的比较。
Eur J Dent. 2014 Jul;8(3):395-401. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.137655.