• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

别急着用牙刷:一项关于牙刷卫生的研究。

Don't Rush with Your Brush: An Study on Toothbrush Hygiene.

作者信息

Sharma Surbhi, Tandon Sandeep, Rai Tripti S, Mathur Rinku, Rathore Ambika S, Gupta Sumedha

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;17(2):162-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776
PMID:39184888
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339473/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual (AV) aids in creating awareness of toothbrush hygiene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized trial study was conducted on 40 children aged 6-11 years. Children were given soft toothbrushes and then collected after brushing for 14 days. The toothbrushes were collected and sent to the laboratory for microbial culture evaluation. A questionnaire consisting of various questions regarding daily toothbrush hygiene practices was filled by the parents at the same time. After 14 days, brushes were collected, and the parents were shown an AV aid regarding toothbrush decontamination, parental awareness, and supervision. Those children were given new sets of toothbrushes and instructed to decontaminate them with chlorhexidine solution. After 14 days, the same questionnaire was filled out by the parents and toothbrushes were collected and immediately sent to the laboratory for microbial culture evaluation.

RESULTS

All the sampled toothbrushes had significant ( < 0.001) bacterial growth after 14 days of use. The use of disinfectant led to a 99.98% reduction in microbial colony counts. Hence, showed a significant result. Questionnaire analysis showed a positive parental approach toward maintaining toothbrush hygiene.

CONCLUSION

Cleaning and disinfection of toothbrushes is crucial to stop the spread of disease since bacterial contamination cannot be 100% eliminated. AV aids can be effective tools for increasing awareness.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Through this study, we want to emphasize toothbrush hygiene and create awareness for the same through AV aid because a healthy toothbrush leads to healthy oral health.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Sharma S, Tandon S, Rai TS, Don't Rush with Your Brush: An Study on Toothbrush Hygiene. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(2):162-167.

摘要

目的

评估视听辅助工具在提高牙刷卫生意识方面的效果。

材料与方法

本随机试验研究针对40名6至11岁的儿童进行。给儿童发放软毛牙刷,在刷牙14天后收集牙刷。将收集到的牙刷送往实验室进行微生物培养评估。同时,家长填写一份包含各种关于日常牙刷卫生习惯问题的问卷。14天后,收集牙刷,并向家长展示关于牙刷消毒、家长意识和监督的视听辅助工具。这些儿童被给予新的牙刷,并被指示用洗必泰溶液对其进行消毒。14天后,家长再次填写相同的问卷,收集牙刷并立即送往实验室进行微生物培养评估。

结果

所有抽样牙刷在使用14天后均有显著(<0.001)的细菌生长。使用消毒剂使微生物菌落计数减少了99.98%。因此,显示出显著结果。问卷分析显示家长在保持牙刷卫生方面采取了积极的态度。

结论

牙刷的清洁和消毒对于阻止疾病传播至关重要,因为细菌污染无法100%消除。视听辅助工具可以成为提高意识的有效工具。

临床意义

通过本研究,我们希望强调牙刷卫生,并通过视听辅助工具提高对此的认识,因为健康的牙刷有助于保持口腔健康。

如何引用本文

夏尔马S、坦登S、 Rai TS,《别急于刷牙:一项关于牙刷卫生的研究》。《国际临床儿科学牙科杂志》2024;17(2):162 - 167。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/8aefd2855864/ijcpd-17-162-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/326c703160ce/ijcpd-17-162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/7aa5cb68833c/ijcpd-17-162-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/3cc08d630874/ijcpd-17-162-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/8aefd2855864/ijcpd-17-162-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/326c703160ce/ijcpd-17-162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/7aa5cb68833c/ijcpd-17-162-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/3cc08d630874/ijcpd-17-162-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a41c/11339473/8aefd2855864/ijcpd-17-162-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Don't Rush with Your Brush: An Study on Toothbrush Hygiene.别急着用牙刷:一项关于牙刷卫生的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;17(2):162-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776.
2
Assessment of Microbial Contamination of a Toothbrush Head with and without a Protective Cover: An Study.带和不带保护套的牙刷头微生物污染评估:一项研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;15(4):455-457. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2403.
3
Ionic vs Manual Toothbrushes: Effect on Plaque and Oral Hygiene Status in Children.电动牙刷与手动牙刷:对儿童牙菌斑和口腔卫生状况的影响。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):375-378. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1675.
4
[Clinical analysis of the cleaning effectiveness of toothbrushes of various types in children aged 6-15 years after a single brushing].[6至15岁儿童单次刷牙后不同类型牙刷清洁效果的临床分析]
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2021;100(6):76-81. doi: 10.17116/stomat202110006176.
5
Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using ultra violet rays and 0.2% chlorhexidine solution: A comparative clinical study.使用紫外线和0.2%氯己定溶液评估牙刷消毒效果:一项对比临床研究。
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;6(1):12-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.145769.
6
Comparison of Effectiveness of Manual Orthodontic, Powered and Sonic Toothbrushes on Oral Hygiene of Fixed Orthodontic Patients.手动正畸牙刷、电动牙刷和声波牙刷对固定正畸患者口腔卫生效果的比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Sep-Dec;8(3):181-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1310. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Plaque Removal Using Manual and Powered Toothbrush in Cerebral Palsy Children by Parents/Caregivers: A Randomized Control Crossover Trial.家长/照料者使用手动牙刷和电动牙刷为脑瘫儿童清除牙菌斑的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照交叉试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;16(2):344-349. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2533.
8
Efficacy of Audiovisual Aid in Assessing Parental Attitude toward their Child's Oral Health.视听辅助工具在评估家长对其孩子口腔健康态度方面的效果。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):437-441. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1794.
9
Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush?新型声波牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面是否比手动牙刷更有效?
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):13-8.
10
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study.不同消毒技术对牙刷去污效果的体外研究
Cureus. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e21117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21117. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Evaluating Sanitization of Toothbrushes Using Various Decontamination Methods: A Meta-Analysis.使用各种去污方法评估牙刷的消毒:一项荟萃分析。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019 Jan 27;16(41):364-371.
3
Antimicrobial effects of chlorhexidine, matrica drop mouthwash (chamomile extract), and normal saline on hospitalized patients with endotracheal tubes.
洗必泰、母菊花滴剂漱口水(洋甘菊提取物)和生理盐水对气管插管住院患者的抗菌作用。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;21(5):458-463. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.193390.
4
Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods.通过不同方法对牙刷消毒的评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
Effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection: an in vitro study.牙刷消毒替代方法的有效性:一项体外研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:726190. doi: 10.1155/2014/726190. Epub 2014 May 25.
6
Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study.牙刷头微生物污染的评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.79965.
7
A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating.一种控制牙刷细菌污染的新方法:洗必泰涂层。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 Nov;7(4):241-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00352.x.
8
Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes.两款手动牙刷刷牙时间及牙菌斑清除潜力的临床评估
Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Nov;6(4):321-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00327.x.
9
Contaminated toothbrushes and pharyngitis.受污染的牙刷与咽炎
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Apr;125(4):479.
10
Persistence of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in toothbrushes and removable orthodontic appliances following treatment of pharyngotonsillitis.A组β溶血性链球菌在咽扁桃体炎治疗后在牙刷和可摘矫治器中的持续存在情况。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Sep;124(9):993-5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.124.9.993.